The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reviewing social media use by clinicians: Table 1
Open accessAbstract
Adoption studies of social media use by clinicians were systematically reviewed, up to July 26th, 2011, to determine the extent of adoption and highlight trends in institutional responses. This search led to 370 articles, of which 50 were selected for review, including 15 adoption surveys. The definition of social media is evolving rapidly; the authors define it broadly to include social networks and group-curated reference sites such as Wikipedia. Facebook accounts are very common among health science students (64-96%) and less so for professional clinicians (13-47%). Adoption rates have increased sharply in the past 4 years. Wikipedia is widely used as a reference tool. Attempts at incorporating social media into clinical training have met with mixed success. Posting of unprofessional content and breaches of patient confidentiality, especially by students, are not uncommon and have prompted calls for social media guidelines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Social media use among health care providers has risen sharply over the past several years.13”
From Professionalism in a Digital Age: Opportunities and Considerations for Using Social Media in Health Care (2015) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
The Political Power of Social Media
Shirky, C. (2010) · Foreign Affairs · Cited by 1,530
O’Reilly, T. (2009) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,184
Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness
Eysenbach, G. (2008) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1030 · Cited by 1,143 · cited 2×
“0’.(14) Rapid evolution in the commercial landscape quickly dates discussions of commercial services.”
BackgroundSocialnomics: how social media transforms the way we live and do business
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-1576 · Cited by 752 · cited 1×
“Social media use by American adults nearly doubled from 26% in 2008 to 47% in 2011,(4) and has been linked to events as disparate as political revolutions,(5) a general shortening of attention span,(6) and the decline of print news media.(7) Some observers in the publishing industry have called social media the greate…”
BackgroundFrost, J. H., & Massagli, M. P. (2008) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1053 · Cited by 533 · cited 1×
“Examples include emergency broadcasts during natural disasters,(9) access to free (but often questionable)(10) 11 medical information online, and virtual patient communities.(12) Impact has also been felt internally as a new generation of clinicians enters training with ingrained communication habits unimagined by the…”
BackgroundOnline Posting of Unprofessional Content by Medical Students
Chretien, K. C. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1387 · Cited by 448
The Intersection of Online Social Networking with Medical Professionalism
Thompson, L. A., Dawson, K., Ferdig, R., Black, E. W., Boyer, J., Coutts, J., & Black, N. P. (2008) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0538-8 · Cited by 425
Integrating social media into emergency-preparedness efforts.
Merchant, R. M., Elmer, S., & Lurie, N. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1103591 · Cited by 364
Unconscious (Implicit) Bias and Health Disparities: Where Do We Go from Here?
Blair, I. V., Steiner, J. F., & Havranek, E. P. (2011) · The Permanente Journal · doi:10.7812/tpp/11.979 · Cited by 329
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Thompson JB . Merchants of Culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2010.
- Pender MP Lasserre KE Del Mar C . Is Wikipedia unsuitable as a clinical information resource for medical students? Med Teach 2009;31:1095–6.
- American Medical Association. AMA Policy: Professionalism in the Use of Social Media. Press Release. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/meeting/professionalism-social-media.shtml (accessed 12 Aug 2011).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Antheunis, M. L., Tates, K., & Nieboer, T. E. (2013) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.020 · Cited by 632
“This touches the necessity to formulate a clear social media policy, offering health professionals a guideline how to maximize potential benefits through engagement with social media by avoiding pitfalls such as violating patient privacy or the mingling of personal and professional information [9,25].”
BackgroundHow Health Care Professionals Use Social Media to Create Virtual Communities: An Integrative Review
Rolls, K., Hansen, M. M., Jackson, D. W., & Elliott, D. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5312 · Cited by 313
“Although each review had different questions, there were overlapping content areas: (1) social media adoption by clinicians [110], pharmacists [112,113], and radiographers [111]; (2) social media use for communication between patients, patient–clinician, or clinicians [116]; (3) type of social media use by clinicians…”
InfluentialPandey, A., Hasan, S., Dubey, D., & Sarangi, S. (2013) · Journal of Cancer Education · doi:10.1007/s13187-012-0446-9 · Cited by 213
Lin, X., & Kishore, R. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120574 · Cited by 225
Purdy, E. I., Thoma, B., Bednarczyk, J. M., Migneault, D., & Sherbino, J. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1017/cem.2014.73 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- von Muhlen, M., & Ohno-Machado, L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 777-781
- ISSN
- 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-974X
- PMC
- PMC3422846
- OpenAlex
- W2140815329
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- University of California, San Diego
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U54HL108460)
- Fogarty International Center (R24TW008805)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- social media use, clinicians, technology adoption, health sciences students, Facebook, Wikipedia, clinical teaching, professional conduct, patient confidentiality, social media policy, institutional policy
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Confidentiality, Diffusion of Innovation, Education, Professional, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Students, Medical, Students, Pharmacy, Internet, Professional Misconduct, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review