The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Web-scale pharmacovigilance: listening to signals from the crowd
Open accessAbstract
Adverse drug events cause substantial morbidity and mortality and are often discovered after a drug comes to market. We hypothesized that Internet users may provide early clues about adverse drug events via their online information-seeking. We conducted a large-scale study of Web search log data gathered during 2010. We pay particular attention to the specific drug pairing of paroxetine and pravastatin, whose interaction was reported to cause hyperglycemia after the time period of the online logs used in the analysis. We also examine sets of drug pairs known to be associated with hyperglycemia and those not associated with hyperglycemia. We find that anonymized signals on drug interactions can be mined from search logs. Compared to analyses of other sources such as electronic health records (EHR), logs are inexpensive to collect and mine. The results demonstrate that logs of the search activities of populations of computer users can contribute to drug safety surveillance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cyberchondria: studies of the escalation of medical concerns in web search
White, R. W., & Horvitz, E. (2009) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1629096.1629101 · Cited by 546
Self-citationTatonetti, N. P., Fernald, G. H., & Altman, R. B. (2012) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000214 · Cited by 203
Self-citation
Cited by
Acquisti, A., Taylor, C., & Wagman, L. (2016) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.54.2.442 · Cited by 1,283
Krumholz, H. M. (2014) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0053 · Cited by 589
Nikfarjam, A., Sarker, A., O’Connor, K., Ginn, R., & Gonzalez, G. (2015) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocu041 · Cited by 543
In silico methods for drug repurposing and pharmacology
Hodos, R. A., Kidd, B. A., Shameer, K., Readhead, B. P., & Dudley, J. T. (2016) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1337 · Cited by 326
Creating Value In Health Care Through Big Data: Opportunities And Policy Implications
Roski, J., Bo-Linn, G. W., & Andrews, T. A. (2014) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0147 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- White, R. W., Tatonetti, N. P., Shah, N. H., Altman, R. B., & Horvitz, E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-03-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 404-408
- ISSN
- 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-974X
- OpenAlex
- W2121827699
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 48.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Web-scale pharmacovigilance: listening to signals from the crowd. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001482
- The paper
- White, R. W., Tatonetti, N. P., Shah, N. H., Altman, R. B., & Horvitz, E. (2013). Web-scale pharmacovigilance: listening to signals from the crowd. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001482
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.