Cited by 546Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Cyberchondria: studies of the escalation of medical concerns in web search

White, Ryen W., Horvitz, Eric·2009·ACM Transactions on Information Systems

Abstract

The World Wide Web provides an abundant source of medical information. This information can assist people who are not healthcare professionals to better understand health and illness, and to provide them with feasible explanations for symptoms. However, the Web has the potential to increase the anxieties of people who have little or no medical training, especially when Web search is employed as a diagnostic procedure. We use the term cyberchondria to refer to the unfounded escalation of concerns about common symptomatology, based on the review of search results and literature on the Web. We performed a large-scale, longitudinal, log-based study of how people search for medical information online, supported by a survey of 515 individuals' health-related search experiences. We focused on the extent to which common, likely innocuous symptoms can escalate into the review of content on serious, rare conditions that are linked to the common symptoms. Our results show that Web search engines have the potential to escalate medical concerns. We show that escalation is associated with the amount and distribution of medical content viewed by users, the presence of escalatory terminology in pages visited, and a user's predisposition to escalate versus to seek more reasonable explanations for ailments. We also demonstrate the persistence of postsession anxiety following escalations and the effect that such anxieties can have on interrupting user's activities across multiple sessions. Our findings underscore the potential costs and challenges of cyberchondria and suggest actionable design implications that hold opportunity for improving the search and navigation experience for people turning to the Web to interpret common symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1629096.1629101

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, R. W., & Horvitz, E.
Affiliations
Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Information Systems
Published
2009-11
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
1-37
ISSN
  • 1046-8188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2868
OpenAlex
W2119265954
Cited by
546
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 17
FWCI
31.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
cyberchondria, online health information seeking, anxiety, search engine results, user behavior, design implications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review