Cited by 589Big Data Technologies and ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Big data and new knowledge in medicine: the thinking, training, and tools needed for a learning health system.

Open access
Krumholz, Harlan M.·2014·Health Affairs

Abstract

Big data in medicine--massive quantities of health care data accumulating from patients and populations and the advanced analytics that can give those data meaning--hold the prospect of becoming an engine for the knowledge generation that is necessary to address the extensive unmet information needs of patients, clinicians, administrators, researchers, and health policy makers. This article explores the ways in which big data can be harnessed to advance prediction, performance, discovery, and comparative effectiveness research to address the complexity of patients, populations, and organizations. Incorporating big data and next-generation analytics into clinical and population health research and practice will require not only new data sources but also new thinking, training, and tools. Adequately utilized, these reservoirs of data can be a practically inexhaustible source of knowledge to fuel a learning health care system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0053

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deployment governance can be treated as a first-class computational problem in clinical AI systems, distinct from model development and validation.

    “This study demonstrates that deployment governance can be treated as a first class computational problem in clinical artificial intelligence systems, distinct from model development and validation [8-11].”

    From Adaptive FHIR Native AI Governance for Clinical Decision Support: A Modular, Auditable Deployment Framework for Real World Clinical AI (2026) · cites this paper as [9]

    In “New Methods and Tools” (page unavailable), the paper says health care leaders should attend to implementation beyond developing tools. That supports treating implementation as a separate concern, but the paper does not describe deployment governance as a computational problem in clinical AI or distinguish it from model validation. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Robotic-assisted surgeries provide precision, stability, and skill, reducing risk of complications and accelerating patient recovery times.

    “Robotic-assisted surgeries provide unparalleled precision, stability, and skill, reducing the risk of complications and accelerating patient recovery times.”

    From Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review (2023) · cites this paper as [15]

    The ‘What The Future Could Hold’ section discusses using algorithms to predict recovery after surgery, not the effects of robotic-assisted surgery. Searches for robotic surgery, precision, complications, and faster recovery found no passage in our copy supporting the attributed claim; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Surgeons can perform minimally invasive procedures with greater accuracy using robotic-assisted surgery.

    “Surgeons can perform minimally invasive procedures with greater accuracy.[15]”

    From Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review (2023) · cites this paper as [15]

    The “What The Future Could Hold” section discusses algorithms for predicting recovery after surgery, not how surgeons perform procedures. Searches for robotic-assisted surgery, minimally invasive procedures, and surgical accuracy found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Current monitoring practices are often reactive, retrospective, or limited to aggregate performance metrics, offering limited support for real-time governance or accountability.

    “Current monitoring practices are often reactive, retrospective, or limited to aggregate performance metrics, offering limited support for real time governance or accountability [8, 9].”

    From Adaptive FHIR Native AI Governance for Clinical Decision Support: A Modular, Auditable Deployment Framework for Real World Clinical AI (2026) · cites this paper as [9]

    In “The Stakes,” the paper says routine clinical data are largely wasted; in “What the Future Could Hold,” it proposes using data to anticipate problems. Neither section characterizes current monitoring practices as reactive, retrospective, or limited to aggregate metrics, or assesses their support for real-time governance and accountability. Searches for those terms and related monitoring language found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The framework is organized into three interacting layers-a data layer, a governance layer, and an execution layer-intended to decouple clinical data representation, deployment decision logic, and predictive model execution.

    “The framework is organized into three interacting layers: a data layer, a governance layer, and an execution layer. This modular separation is intended to decouple clinical data representation, deployment decision logic, and predictive model execution, enabling independent evaluation and reuse of each component [9-11].”

    From Adaptive FHIR Native AI Governance for Clinical Decision Support: A Modular, Auditable Deployment Framework for Real World Clinical AI (2026) · cites this paper as [9]

    The New Methods and Tools section discusses analytic approaches, and What the Future Could Hold discusses interactive presentation of results. Neither describes a data, governance, and execution layer or the proposed decoupling of clinical data representation, deployment decisions, and model execution. Searches for those layer names and functions found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]National Research Council Toward precision medicine: building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease Washington (DC) National Academies Press 2011 22536618
  2. [18]National Research Council Frontiers in massive data analysis Washington (DC) National Academies Press 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krumholz, H. M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Krumholz, Harlan M.
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2014-07
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
1163-1170
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2027540165
Cited by
589
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 126 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
74.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL105270)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
big data in healthcare, learning health systems, health care analytics, comparative effectiveness research, prediction, clinical research, population health, health data sources, clinician training, health policy
MeSH terms
Data Interpretation, Statistical, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Learning, Medical Informatics, Thinking, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Data Mining, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review