Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and use of active clinical decision support for preemptive pharmacogenomics

Open access
Bell, Gillian C, Crews, Kristine R, Wilkinson, Mark R, Haidar, Cyrine E, Hicks, J Kevin, Baker, Donald K, Kornegay, Nancy M, Yang, Wenjian, Cross, Shane J, Howard, Scott C, Freimuth, Robert R, Evans, William E, Broeckel, Ulrich, Relling, Mary V, Hoffman, James M·2014·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Active clinical decision support (CDS) delivered through an electronic health record (EHR) facilitates gene-based drug prescribing and other applications of genomics to patient care. OBJECTIVE: We describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of active CDS for multiple pharmacogenetic test results reported preemptively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical pharmacogenetic test results accompanied by clinical interpretations are placed into the patient's EHR, typically before a relevant drug is prescribed. Problem list entries created for high-risk phenotypes provide an unambiguous trigger for delivery of post-test alerts to clinicians when high-risk drugs are prescribed. In addition, pre-test alerts are issued if a very-high risk medication is prescribed (eg, a thiopurine), prior to the appropriate pharmacogenetic test result being entered into the EHR. Our CDS can be readily modified to incorporate new genes or high-risk drugs as they emerge. RESULTS: Through November 2012, 35 customized pharmacogenetic rules have been implemented, including rules for TPMT with azathioprine, thioguanine, and mercaptopurine, and for CYP2D6 with codeine, tramadol, amitriptyline, fluoxetine, and paroxetine. Between May 2011 and November 2012, the pre-test alerts were electronically issued 1106 times (76 for thiopurines and 1030 for drugs metabolized by CYP2D6), and the post-test alerts were issued 1552 times (1521 for TPMT and 31 for CYP2D6). Analysis of alert outcomes revealed that the interruptive CDS appropriately guided prescribing in 95% of patients for whom they were issued. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience illustrates the feasibility of developing computational systems that provide clinicians with actionable alerts for gene-based drug prescribing at the point of care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001993

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 208

Metadata

Authors
Bell, G. C., Crews, K. R., Wilkinson, M. R., Haidar, C. E., Hicks, J. K., Baker, D. K., Kornegay, N. M., Yang, W., Cross, S. J., Howard, S. C., Freimuth, R. R., Evans, W. E., Broeckel, U., Relling, M. V., & Hoffman, J. M.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2014-02
Volume
21
Issue
e1
Pages
e93-e99
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2143158333
Cited by
208
References
6
FWCI
24.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and use of active clinical decision support for preemptive pharmacogenomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001993
The paper
Bell, G. C., Crews, K. R., Wilkinson, M. R., Haidar, C. E., Hicks, J. K., Baker, D. K., Kornegay, N. M., Yang, W., Cross, S. J., Howard, S. C., Freimuth, R. R., Evans, W. E., Broeckel, U., Relling, M. V., & Hoffman, J. M. (2014). Development and use of active clinical decision support for preemptive pharmacogenomics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001993

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.