The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic prescription: a systematic review of user groups' perceptions
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review identifying users groups' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic prescription (e-prescribing) in primary care. METHODS: We included studies following these criteria: presence of an empirical design, focus on the users' experience of e-prescribing implementation, conducted in primary care, and providing data on barriers and facilitators to e-prescribing implementation. We used the Donabedian logical model of healthcare quality (adapted by Barber et al) to analyze our findings. RESULTS: We found 34 publications (related to 28 individual studies) eligible to be included in this review. These studies identified a total of 594 elements as barriers or facilitators to e-prescribing implementation. Most user groups perceived that e-prescribing was facilitated by design and technical concerns, interoperability, content appropriate for the users, attitude towards e-prescribing, productivity, and available resources. DISCUSSION: This review highlights the importance of technical and organizational support for the successful implementation of e-prescribing systems. It also shows that the same factor can be seen as a barrier or a facilitator depending on the project's own circumstances. Moreover, a factor can change in nature, from a barrier to a facilitator and vice versa, in the process of e-prescribing implementation. CONCLUSIONS: This review summarizes current knowledge on factors related to e-prescribing implementation in primary care that could support decision makers in their design of effective implementation strategies. Finally, future studies should emphasize on the perceptions of other user groups, such as pharmacists, managers, vendors, and patients, who remain neglected in the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“in relation to e-prescribing, clinicians did not want to solve implementation problems and believed this should be done by non-clinical staff [14].”
From Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews (2015) · cites this paper as [14]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Resistance to change caused by disagreement with the evidence, negative beliefs about the usefulness or added value of the intervention or belief that the intervention was not part of their role were commonly described as a barrier to implementation [3, 14, 35, 41, 67–70, 76, 77, 80].”
From Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews (2015) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Existing reviews tend to focus either on a particular type of complex intervention (e.g. introduction of new technologies [14] or promoting uptake and use of guidelines [15]) or on a particular health condition (e.g. mental health [16] or diabetes [17]).”
From Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews (2015) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“When the fit was good [14, 73, 74], for example, when e-prescribing was sufficiently integrated as part of clinician workflow, work process was improved [14].”
From Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews (2015) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Contextual factors that are perceived as barriers at the beginning of implementation may become facilitators later on in the implementation process [14].”
From Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews (2015) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“work processes were viewed as a barrier during the transition phase but became a facilitator when the intervention was formally integrated and work flow was improved [14].”
From Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews (2015) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While the users had a less positive view of the intervention during pre-implementation phase, their views became more positive with the increasing use of the intervention during the transition and post-implementation phases.”
From Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews (2015) · cites this paper as [14]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Relevant barriers and facilitators are dynamic and likely to change over time [14, 28].”
From Achieving change in primary care—causes of the evidence to practice gap: systematic reviews of reviews (2015) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“The attitudes of colleagues [25, 41] and patients [25, 27, 41] were also reported to influence staff attitudes with regard to e-health acceptance as were staff demographic factors [23, 46, 56].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“Specifically, fears over a loss of autonomy [16, 18, 27, 34, 37, 39, 43], concerns about liability [16, 18, 22, 37, 43, 51], concerns over patient privacy and security being compromised [16, 18, 20, 23, 24, 27, 28, 30, 31, 33, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51–53, 56, 57], and perceived threats to patient and health professional relationships [18, 25, 27, 28, 31, 34, 37–39, 41, 43, 54, 57] through the”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“Planning for implementation was important for success, whereas the lack of a strategic plan was reported as a barrier to e-health implementation [24, 27, 31, 44, 50].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“Planning for implementation was important for success, whereas the lack of a strategic plan was reported as a barrier to e-health implementation [24, 27, 31, 44, 50].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 · Cited by 14,496
Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations
GREENHALGH, T., ROBERT, G., MACFARLANE, F., BATE, P., & KYRIAKIDOU, O. (2004) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.0887-378x.2004.00325.x · Cited by 7,448
Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?: A Framework for Improvement
Cabana, M. D., Rand, C. S., Powe, N. R., Wu, A. W., Wilson, M. H., Abboud, P.-A. C., & Rubin, H. R. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.15.1458 · Cited by 6,677
Evaluating the quality of medical care
DONABEDIAN, A. (2005) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x · Cited by 6,102
Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
Donabedian, A. (1966) · The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3348969 · Cited by 4,418
Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients
Pirmohamed, M., James, S., Meakin, S., Green, C. A., SCOTT, A. K., Walley, T. J., Farrar, K., Park, B. K., & Breckenridge, A. M. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7456.15 · Cited by 3,236
Sullivan, L. E. (2009) · The SAGE Glossary of the Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.4135/9781412972024.n747 · Cited by 2,442
Pluye, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., & Johnson-Lafleur, J. (2009) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.009 · Cited by 1,119
Self-citationFeldstein, A. C., & Glasgow, R. E. (2008) · The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety · doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34030-6 · Cited by 987
Gagnon, M.-P., Desmartis, M., Labrecque, M., Car, J., Pagliari, C., Pluye, P., Frémont, P., Gagnon, J., Tremblay, N., & Légaré, F. (2012) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4 · Cited by 637
Self-citationDonabedian, A. (1978) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.417400 · Cited by 571
Technology Acceptance among Physicians: A New Take on TAM
Yarbrough, A. K., & Smith, T. B. (2007) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558707305942 · Cited by 482
McGinn, C. A., Grenier, S., Duplantie, J., Shaw, N., Sicotte, C., Mathieu, L., Leduc, Y., Légaré, F., & Gagnon, M.-P. (2011) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-9-46 · Cited by 393
Self-citationCavicchi, C., & Vagnoni, E. (2006) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.016 · Cited by 361
Greenhalgh, T., Stramer, K., Bratan, T., Byrne, E., Russell, J., & Potts, H. W. W. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c3111 · Cited by 275
Reckmann, M., Westbrook, J. I., Koh, Y., Lo, C., & Day, R. O. (2009) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m3050 · Cited by 271
Drug‐related hospital admissions: a review of Australian studies published 1988‐1996
Roughead, E. E., Gilbert, A. L., Sansom, L. N., & Primrose, J. G. (1998) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb138996.x · Cited by 227
Evaluation of Outpatient Computerized Physician Medication Order Entry Systems: A Systematic Review
Eslami, S., Abu-Hanna, A., & de Keizer, N. F. (2007) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2238 · Cited by 200
Devine, E. B., Hansen, R. N., Wilson‐Norton, J. L., Lawless, N. M., Fisk, A. W., Blough, D. K., Martin, D. P., & Sullivan, S. D. (2010) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m3285 · Cited by 181
Tamblyn, R., Huang, A., Kawasumi, Y., Bartlett, G., Grad, R., Jacques, A., Dawes, M., Abrahamowicz, M., Perreault, R., Taylor, L., et al. (2006) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1887 · Cited by 137
Hug, B. L., Witkowski, D. J., Sox, C. M., Keohane, C. A., Seger, D. L., Yoon, C. S., Matheny, M. E., & Bates, D. W. (2009) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-009-1141-3 · Cited by 116
e-Prescribing, Efficiency, Quality: Lessons from the Computerization of UK Family Practice
Schade, C. P., Sullivan, F., de Lusignan, S., & Madeley, J. (2006) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2041 · Cited by 113
Tamblyn, R. M., Huang, A. R., Taylor, L., Kawasumi, Y., Bartlett, G., Grad, R. M., Jacques, A., Dawes, M. G., Abrahamowicz, M., Perreault, R. B., et al. (2008) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2606 · Cited by 113
Abramson, E. L., Patel, V., Malhotra, S., Pfoh, E. R., Osorio, S. N., Cheriff, A. D., Cole, C. L., Bunce, A., Ash, J. S., & Kaushal, R. (2012) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.010 · Cited by 108
Physicians' Experiences Using Commercial E-Prescribing Systems
Grossman, J. M., Gerland, A. M., Reed, M. C., & Fahlman, C. (2007) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.w393 · Cited by 102
Henriksen, K., Battles, J. B., Marks, E. S., & Lewin, D. I. (2005) · Cited by 98
Find Duplicates among the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Databases in Systematic Review
Qi, X., Yang, M., Ren, W., Jia, J., Wang, J., Han, G., & Fan, D. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071838 · Cited by 98
Clinicians' Assessments of Electronic Medication Safety Alerts in Ambulatory Care
Weingart, S. N., Simchowitz, B., Shiman, L., Brouillard, D., Cyrulik, A., Davis, R. B., Isaac, T., Massagli, M. P., Morway, L., Sands, D. Z., et al. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.300 · Cited by 93
Physicians' attitudes towards ePrescribing – evaluation of a Swedish full-scale implementation
Hellström, L., Wærn, K., Montelius, E., Åstrand, B., Rydberg, T., & Petersson, G. (2009) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-9-37 · Cited by 93
Grossman, J. M., Cross, D. A., Boukus, E. R., & Cohen, G. R. (2011) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000515 · Cited by 86
Cresswell, K. M., Coleman, J. J., Slee, A., Williams, R., Sheikh, A., & ePrescribing Programme Team (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/annotation/1cec200a-6652-449f-91e9-8effb769de1e · Cited by 80
Factors Related to Physicians’ Adoption of Electronic Prescribing: Results From a National Survey
Pizzi, L. T., Suh, D., Barone, J. G., & Nash, D. B. (2005) · American Journal of Medical Quality · doi:10.1177/1062860604273775 · Cited by 78
Evaluation of e-prescribing in chain community pharmacy: Best-practice recommendations
Rupp, M. T., & Warholak, T. L. (2008) · Journal of the American Pharmacists Association · doi:10.1331/japha.2008.07031 · Cited by 73
Wang, C.-H. J., Patel, M. H., Schueth, A. J., Bradley, M. A., Wu, S., Crosson, J. C., Glassman, P. A., & Bell, D. S. (2009) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2998 · Cited by 73
Qualitative evaluation of an electronic prescribing and administration system
Barber, N., Cornford, T., & Klecuń, E. (2007) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qshc.2006.019505 · Cited by 72
Meaningful Use of Electronic Prescribing in 5 Exemplar Primary Care Practices
Crosson, J. C., Etz, R., Wu, S., Straus, S. G., Eisenman, D. P., & Bell, D. S. (2011) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.1261 · Cited by 71
Assessing the value of electronic prescribing in ambulatory care: A focus group study
Weingart, S. N., Massagli, M. P., Cyrulik, A., Isaac, T., Morway, L., Sands, D. Z., & Weissman, J. S. (2009) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.03.007 · Cited by 64
Perceptions of e-prescribing efficiencies and inefficiencies in ambulatory care
Lapane, K. L., Rosen, R. K., & Dube, C. E. (2010) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.10.018 · Cited by 63
E-Prescribing And The Medicare Modernization Act Of 2003
Bell, D. S., & Friedman, M. A. (2005) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1159 · Cited by 61
Variation in Electronic Prescribing Implementation Among Twelve Ambulatory Practices
Crosson, J. C., Isaacson, N. F., Lancaster, D., McDonald, E. A., Schueth, A. J., DiCicco‐Bloom, B., Newman, J., Wang, C.-H. J., & Bell, D. S. (2008) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0494-8 · Cited by 57
Transitioning Between Electronic Health Records: Effects on Ambulatory Prescribing Safety
Abramson, E. L., Malhotra, S., Fischer, K. M., Edwards, A. M., Pfoh, E. R., Osorio, S. N., Cheriff, A. D., & Kaushal, R. (2011) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1703-z · Cited by 53
Cresswell, K. M., Coleman, J. J., Slee, A., Williams, R., Sheikh, A., & ePrescribing Programme Team (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053369 · Cited by 53
Attitude of Physicians Towards Automatic Alerting in Computerized Physician Order Entry Systems
Jung, M., Hackl, W. O., Kirrane, F., Borbolla, D. A., Jaspers, M., Oertle, M., Koutkias, V. G., Ferret, L., Massari, P., Lawton, K., et al. (2012) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.3414/me12-02-0007 · Cited by 48
Retail pharmacy staff perceptions of design strengths and weaknesses of electronic prescribing
Abraham, O., & Chui, M. A. (2012) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000779 · Cited by 46
Evaluating User Satisfaction with an Electronic Prescription System in a Primary Care Group
Tan, W. S., Phang, J. S. K., & Tan, L. K. (2009) · Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore · doi:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.v38n6p494 · Cited by 45
Technological viewpoints (frames) about electronic prescribing in physician practices
Agarwal, R., Angst, C. M., DesRoches, C. M., & Fischer, M. A. (2010) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.2009.001826 · Cited by 42
MEDLINE Versus EMBASE and CINAHL for Telemedicine Searches
Bahaadinbeigy, K., Yogesan, K., & Wootton, R. (2010) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2010.0046 · Cited by 40
Devine, E. B., Williams, E. C., Martin, D. P., Sittig, D. F., Tarczy-Hornoch, P. Z., Payne, T. H., & Sullivan, S. D. (2010) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-10-72 · Cited by 40
Beyond the basics: Refills by electronic prescribing
Goldman, R. E., Dube, C. E., & Lapane, K. L. (2010) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.04.003 · Cited by 38
Adoption of and experience with e-prescribing by primary care physicians
Jariwala, K., Holmes, E. R., Banahan, B. F., & McCaffrey, D. J. (2012) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.04.003 · Cited by 36
Prescribers' expectations and barriers to electronic prescribing of controlled substances
Thomas, C. P., Kim, M. Y., McDonald, A., Kreiner, P. W., Kelleher, S. J., Blackman, M. B., Kaufman, P. N., & Carrow, G. M. (2011) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000209 · Cited by 34
DesRoches, C. M., Agarwal, R., Angst, C. M., & Fischer, M. A. (2010) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0557 · Cited by 34
Crosson, J. C., Schueth, A. J., Isaacson, N. F., & Bell, D. S. (2012) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.2012.01.100297 · Cited by 34
First results from an intensified monitoring system to estimate drug related hospital admissions
Schneeweiß, S., Göttler, M., Hasford, J., Swoboda, W. J., Hippius, M., Hoffmann, A., Riethling, A., & Krappweis, J. (2001) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01425.x · Cited by 32
Physicians' attitudes towards eprescribing: a comparative web survey in Austria and Sweden
Steinschaden, T., Petersson, G., & Åstrand, B. (2009) · Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics · doi:10.14236/jhi.v17i4.743 · Cited by 27
Rahimi, B., & Timpka, T. (2010) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00228-010-0936-9 · Cited by 26
Electronic prescriptions and disruptions to the jurisdiction of community pharmacists
Motulsky, A., Sicotte, C., Lamothe, L., Winslade, N. E., & Tamblyn, R. M. (2011) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.009 · Cited by 24
Self-citationPlanned implementations of ePrescribing systems in NHS hospitals in England: a questionnaire study
Crowe, S., Cresswell, K. M., Avery, A. J., Slee, A., Coleman, J. J., & Sheikh, A. (2010) · JRSM Short Reports · doi:10.1258/shorts.2010.010040 · Cited by 19
Physician practices, e-prescribing and accessing information to improve prescribing decisions.
Grossman, J. M., Boukus, E. R., Cross, D. A., & Cohen, G. R. (2011) · PubMed · Cited by 18
Amirfar, S., Anane, S., Buck, M., Cohen, R., Lonardo, S. S. D., Maa, P., McCullough, C., Plagianos, M. G., Pulgarin, C., Taverna, J., et al. (2011) · Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics · doi:10.14236/jhi.v19i2.800 · Cited by 13
E-prescribing: attitudes and perceptions of community pharmacists in Puerto Rico
Clauson, K. A., Alkhateeb, F. M., Lugo, K. D., & Khanfar, N. M. (2011) · International Journal of Electronic Healthcare · doi:10.1504/ijeh.2011.039057 · Cited by 12
Harvey, J., Avery, A. J., Waring, J. J., Hibberd, R. E., & Barber, N. (2011) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-806-9-374 · Cited by 10
Even when physicians adopt e-prescribing, use of advanced features lags.
Grossman, J. M. (2010) · PubMed · Cited by 9
Physician Use of Hand-held Computers for Drug Information and Prescribing
Galt, K. A., Siracuse, M. V., Rule, A. M., Clark, B. E., & Taylor, W. (2005) · Cited by 8
Implementing an E-Prescribing System in Outpatient Mental Health Programs
Rothbard, A. B., Noll, E. L., Kuno, E., Zubritsky, C. D., Hurford, M. O., Holzer, C., & Hadley, T. R. (2012) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-011-0392-6 · Cited by 6
Henriksen, K., Jb, B., Es, M., & Di, L. (2005) · Cited by 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., Lynch, J., Hughes, G., A'Court, C., Hinder, S., Fahy, N., Procter, R., & Shaw, S. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8775 · Cited by 2,887
“This list (and a reciprocal list of facilitators) resonates with other barriers-and-facilitators studies in the literature, including electronic patient record systems [7,19], electronic prescribing [20,21] and surgical safety checklists [22].”
Ross, J., Stevenson, F., Lau, R., & Murray, E. (2016) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0510-7 · Cited by 1,011
m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review
Gagnon, M.-P., Ngangue, P., Payne-Gagnon, J., & Desmartis, M. (2016) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv052 · Cited by 622
Self-citationLau, R., Stevenson, F., Ong, B. N., Dziedzic, K., Treweek, S., Eldridge, S., Everitt, H., Kennedy, A., Qureshi, N., Rogers, A., et al. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0396-4 · Cited by 533
Successfully implementing a national electronic health record: a rapid umbrella review
Fennelly, O., Cunningham, C., Grogan, L., Cronin, H., O’Shea, C., Roche, M., Lawlor, F., & O’Hare, N. (2020) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104281 · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Gagnon, M.-P., Nsangou, É.-R., Payne-Gagnon, J., Grenier, S., & Sicotte, C.
- Affiliations
- Université Laval (CA)
- Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval (CA)
- Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec (CA)
- École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Payne-Gagnon, Julie
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 535-541
- ISSN
- 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-974X
- PMC
- PMC3994867
- OpenAlex
- W2114801561
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- electronic prescribing, barriers and facilitators, primary care, user perception, interoperability, technical support, organizational support, implementation strategies, Donabedian model
- MeSH terms
- Workforce, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Efficiency, Humans, Nurses, Pharmacists, Primary Health Care, Electronic Prescribing, Physicians, Primary Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
