Cited by 17Medication Adherence and CompliancePharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesCognitive Functions and Memory

Can older people remember medication reminders presented using synthetic speech?

Open access
Wolters, Maria K, Johnson, Christine, Campbell, Pauline E, DePlacido, Christine G, McKinstry, Brian·2015·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

Reminders are often part of interventions to help older people adhere to complicated medication regimes. Computer-generated (synthetic) speech is ideal for tailoring reminders to different medication regimes. Since synthetic speech may be less intelligible than human speech, in particular under difficult listening conditions, we assessed how well older people can recall synthetic speech reminders for medications. 44 participants aged 50–80 with no cognitive impairment recalled reminders for one or four medications after a short distraction. We varied background noise, speech quality, and message design. Reminders were presented using a human voice and two synthetic voices. Data were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models. Reminder recall was satisfactory if reminders were restricted to one familiar medication, regardless of the voice used. Repeating medication names supported recall of lists of medications. We conclude that spoken reminders should build on familiar information and be integrated with other adherence support measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002820

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The analysis of reminder use is based on a research methodology that relies on self-reported adherence as the primary factor for the validation of medication use.

    “the analysis of reminder use is based on a research methodology that relies on self-reported adherence as the primary factor for the validation of medication use [19-23].”

    From Voice Assistant Reminders and the Latency of Scheduled Medication Use in Older Adults With Pain: Descriptive Feasibility Study (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Procedure (p. 3) identifies the study’s measure as the number of medication names participants correctly remembered after hearing a reminder. The Limitations (p. 6) also describe it as a laboratory study. It did not use self-reported adherence as the primary measure to validate medication use. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [8]8. King S, Karaiskos V. The Blizzard challenge 2012. Proceedings of the Blizzard Challenge Workshop; 2012.
  2. [9]9. King S, Karaiskos V. The Blizzard challenge 2013. Proceedings of the Blizzard Challenge Workshop; 2013.
  3. [10]10. Wolters MK, Campbell P, DePlacido C, et al . Making synthetic speech accessible to older people. Proceedings of the 6th ISCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis, Bonn, Germany; 2007:288-93.
  4. [12]12. Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, et al . Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:879-86.
  5. [34]34. Wagener KC, Brand T, Kollmeier B. International crossvalidation of sentence intelligibility tests. Proceedings of the Conference of the European Federation of Audiological Sciences; 2007:8-10.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolters, M. K., Johnson, C., Campbell, P. E., DePlacido, C. G., & McKinstry, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Queen Margaret University (GB)
  • Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
Corresponding author
Wolters, Maria K
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2014-07-30
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
35-42
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W2120297659
Cited by
17
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (acceptedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Technische Universität Berlin
  • Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/G060614/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
medication reminders, synthetic speech, older adults, medication adherence, background noise, speech intelligibility, message design, medication lists
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Automation, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Speech, Speech Intelligibility, Reminder Systems, Hearing Loss, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review