Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 70Child Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsEducational Methods and Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Media use in children: American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations 2016

Guram, Sheena, Heinz, Peter·2018·Archives of disease in childhood - Education & practice edition

Abstract

Media use among children and adolescents is common. The term is used for broadcast and interactive communication, including television, radio, video games, mobile phones and the internet (social media websites and ‘video-chatting’). Television contributes most to media usage time (Ofcom, 2015)1 closely followed by devices connected to the internet. On average, children aged 8–15 years watch 15 hours of television per week,1 and one in four teenagers describe themselves as ‘constantly connected’ to the internet.2 The advantages of being able to easily access information and entertainment and to stay in contact with friends and family contrast with evidence linking increased media use and rising levels of obesity.3 There are also associated risks of sleep disturbance, issues surrounding online safety, compromised privacy and cyberbullying. In November 2016, the American Academy of Paediatricians (AAP) published two policy statements entitled ‘Media and Young Minds’4 and ‘Media Use in School Aged Children and Adolescents’.5 Supported by a number of linked resources, they aim to address some of these issues, provide recommendations on managing the use of media and encourage parents to work together with paediatricians and schools. In 1999, the AAP issued a policy statement addressing media use by children and adolescents.6 A further policy statement was published in 2011 addressing the use of media specifically by children under 2 years of age. While the previous statements have recommended avoiding the use of media in children less than 2 …

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/archdischild-2017-312969

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. McClure, 2015, “Facetime doesn’t count”: video chat as an exception to media restrictions for infants and toddlers, Int J Child Comput Interact, 6, 1, 10.1016/j.ijcci.2016.02.002 · DOI
  2. 10.1542/peds.109.6.1028 · DOI
  3. 10.1542/peds.2016-2591 · DOI
  4. 10.1542/peds.2016-2592 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Anderson, 2001, Early childhood television viewing and adolescent behavior: the recontact study, Monogr Soc Res Child Dev, 66, I-VIII, 1-147

Cited by

See all 70

Metadata

Authors
Guram, S., & Heinz, P.
Affiliations
Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Guram, Sheena
Venue
Archives of disease in childhood - Education & practice edition
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-12-09
Volume
103
Issue
2
Pages
99-101
ISSN
  • 1743-0585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-0593
OpenAlex
W2772723216
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood Education & Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Impacts
Keywords
media use, children, adolescents, television viewing, screen time, video games, social media, internet use, obesity, sleep disorders, online safety, cyberbullying, privacy, parental guidance, AAP policy statements, school-aged children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Pediatrics, Societies, Medical, Television, United States, Guidelines as Topic, Video Games, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Media use in children: American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations 2016. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/archdischild-2017-312969
The paper
Guram, S., & Heinz, P. (2018). Media use in children: American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations 2016. Archives of disease in childhood - Education & practice edition. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-312969

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.