Cited by 42Neonatal and fetal brain pathologyInfant Development and Preterm CareNeonatal Respiratory Health Research

Dose-dependent relationship between acidosis at birth and likelihood of death or cerebral palsy

Open access
Kelly, Rod, Ramaiah, SM, Sheridan, Helen, Cruickshank, Hilary, Rudnicka, Magda, Kissack, Chris, Becher, Julie-Clare, Stenson, Ben J·2018·Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition

Abstract

Background: The acid-base status of infants around birth can provide information about their past, current and future condition. Although umbilical cord blood pH <7.0 or base deficit ≥12 mmol/L is associated with increased risk of adverse outcome, there is uncertainty about the prognostic value of degree of acidosis as previous studies have used different variables, thresholds, outcomes and populations. Methods: Retrospective review of routinely collected clinical data in all live-born inborn infants of 35 weeks gestation or more delivered between January 2005 and December 2013 at the Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Edinburgh, UK. Infants were included if their lowest recorded pH was <7 and/or highest base deficit ≥12 mmol/L on either umbilical cord blood and/or neonatal blood gas within 1 hour of birth. Neurodevelopmental outcome of the infants with encephalopathy was collected from the targeted follow-up database. Results: 56 574 infants were eligible. 506 infants (0.9%) met inclusion criteria. Poor condition at birth and all adverse outcomes increased with worsening acidosis. Combined outcome of death or cerebral palsy was 3%, 10% and 40% at lowest pH of 6.9–6.99, 6.8–6.89 and <6.8, respectively, and 8%, 14% and 59% at a base deficit of 12–15.9, 16–19.9 and 20 mmol/L or more, respectively. Conclusions: There is a dose-dependent relationship between the degree of acidosis within an hour of delivery, and the likelihood of adverse neonatal and later neurodevelopmental outcome in infants born at 35 weeks gestation or more.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314034

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a single study has reported that the risk of adverse outcomes correlated with pH.

    “At present, only a single study has reported that the risk of adverse outcomes correlated with pH.”
  • In that single study, the risk of adverse outcomes increased from 3% when pH 6.9-<7, to 10% and 40% when pH dropped to 6.8-<6.9 and <6.8, respectively.

    “The risk of adverse outcomes increased from 3% when the pH was between 6.9 and <7, to 10% and 40% when the pH dropped to 6.8– <6.9 and <6.8, respectively.”
  • In that single study, 37 neonates (7.3%) did not have umbilical samples, and blood was taken from their bodies some time later.

    “However, 37 neonates (7.3%) of their cohort did not have umbilical samples, and blood was only taken from their bodies some time later.”
  • Information on the prognostic factors of this group of babies is limited.

    “Information on the prognostic factors of this group of babies is limited.”
  • The effect of other potential prognostic factors such as Apgar scores, mode of delivery, gestational age, SGA, implementation of neonatal hypothermic therapy, and presence of a known sentinel event was not assessed in that study.

    “Second, the effect of other potential prognostic factors such as Apgar scores, mode of delivery, gestational age, small for gestational age (SGA), implementation of neonatal hypothermic therapy, and the presence of a known sentinel event was not assessed.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelly, R., Ramaiah, S., Sheridan, H., Cruickshank, H., Rudnicka, M., Kissack, C., Becher, J.-C., & Stenson, B. J.
Affiliations
  • NHS Lothian (GB)
  • Royal Victoria Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Rod
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-12-08
Volume
103
Issue
6
Pages
F567-F572
ISSN
  • 1359-2998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2052
OpenAlex
W2775158939
Cited by
42
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Keywords
neonatal acidosis, umbilical cord pH, base deficit, neonatal asphyxia, neonatal encephalopathy, cerebral palsy, neonatal mortality, neurodevelopmental outcomes, dose-response relationship, term and near-term infants, prognostic factors
MeSH terms
Acidosis, Blood Gas Analysis, Cerebral Palsy, Fetal Blood, United Kingdom, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Oxygen, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate, Risk Assessment, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review