Cited by 38Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Mobile device applications and treatment of autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness

Moon, Sun Jae, Hwang, Jinseub, Hill, Harrison Scott, Kervin, Ryan, Birtwell, Kirstin Brown, Torous, John, McDougle, Christopher J., Kim, Jung Won·2020·Archives of Disease in Childhood

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The current study was performed to assess the evidence for effects of therapeutic intervention with mobile device applications (apps) for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). DESIGN: The main methodology of the current study was systematic review with meta-analysis. SETTING: Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for mobile device apps for individuals with ASD were considered for review in the current study. PATIENTS: The target population was individuals clinically diagnosed with ASD. INTERVENTIONS: Applications that are operable on a smart (mobile) device and interactive with users. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes were based on standardised mean differences in pretrial and post-trial scales in each control and intervention group. RESULTS: Out of a total of 1100 studies (after duplicate removal), 7 RCTs were selected for final analysis. Of the seven studies, two RCTs were further analysed for effects based on the visual and fine motor subscales of the Mullen Scales of Early Learning, which favoured the intervention groups (standardised mean difference (SMD)=0.41, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.80; SMD=0.41, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.80), without either having any heterogeneity (p>0.1) or publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Although it is still early to draw a conclusion, available studies are showing promise for use of mobile device apps for treatment of individuals with ASD. More well-designed and large-scale studies focused on improving behavioural symptoms of ASD are warranted. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019128362.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318258

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moon, S. J., Hwang, J., Hill, H. S., Kervin, R., Birtwell, K. B., Torous, J., McDougle, C. J., & Kim, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
  • Daegu University (KR)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Moon, Sun Jae
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-12-17
Volume
105
Issue
5
Pages
458-462
ISSN
  • 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2044
OpenAlex
W2994629047
Cited by
38
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, mobile application, digital therapeutics, autism treatment, Mullen Scales of Early Learning, visuomotor skills, fine motor skills, behavioural symptoms, early childhood autism
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review