Investigating the determinants of international differences in the prevalence of chronic widespread pain: evidence from the European Male Ageing Study
Abstract
Objectives To determine whether among middle-aged and elderly men there is evidence of international differences in the prevalence of chronic widespread pain (CWP) and whether any such differences could be explained by psychological, psychosocial factors or differences in physical health status. Methods The European Male Ageing Study (EMAS) sampled from population registers in cities (centres) of eight European countries. Each centre recruited an age-stratified sample of men aged 40-79 years. Information on pain was collected by questionnaire and subjects were classified according to whether they satisfied the American College of Rheumatology definition of CWP. Information was collected on social status, mental health, recent life events and co-morbidities. Results Across all centres 3963 subjects completed a study questionnaire, with participation rates ranging from 24% in Hungary to 72% in Estonia. There were significant differences in prevalence: between 5% and 7% in centres in Italy, England, Belgium and Sweden, 9-15% in centres in Spain, Poland and Hungary and 15% in Estonia. There were strong relationships between poor mental health, adverse recent life events, co-morbidities and CWP. Adjustment for these factors explained between half and all of the excess risk in the eastern European centres: the excess risk in Poland was explained (odds ratio (OR) 1.1, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.2) but there remained excess risk in Hungary (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.4 to 1.8) and Estonia (OR 2.6, 95% CI…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Subsequent studies as well as the data of this study showed the importance of quantitative measures of body pain and of the key variables that comprise the SS scale in characterizing fibromyalgia.
“Subsequent studies as well as the data of this study showed the importance of (improved) quantitative measures of body pain (18 -22), and of the key variables that comprise the SS scale in characterizing fibromyalgia.”
From The American College of Rheumatology Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia and Measurement of Symptom Severity (2010) · cites this paper as [22]
Cites
Chronic pain-associated depression: Antecedent or consequence of chronic pain? A review
Fishbain, D. A., Cutler, R., Rosomoff, H. L., & Rosomoff, R. S. (1997) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-199706000-00006 · Cited by 1,074 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wolfe, F., Clauw, D. J., Fitzcharles, M., Goldenberg, D. L., Katz, R. S., Mease, P., Russell, A. S., Russell, I. J., Winfield, J. B., & Yunus, M. B. (2010) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.20140 · Cited by 3,952 · see citing works
Prevalence of chronic pain in the UK: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies
Fayaz, A., Croft, P., Langford, R. M., Donaldson, L. J., & Jones, G. T. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010364 · Cited by 1,355 · see citing works
Chronic widespread pain prevalence in the general population: A systematic review
Andrews, P., Steultjens, M., & Riskowski, J. (2018) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.1090 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
- Authors
- Macfarlane, G. J., Pye, S. R., Finn, J. D., Wu, F. C. W., Silman, A. J., Bartfai, G., Boonen, S., Casanueva, F., Forti, G., Giwercman, A., Han, T. S., Huhtaniemi, I. T., Kula, K., Lean, M. E. J., O’Neill, T. W., Pendleton, N., Punab, M., & Vanderschueren, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
- University of Florence (IT)
- Lund University (SE)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Medical University of Lodz (PL)
- Tartu University Hospital (EE)
- Corresponding author
- Macfarlane, G J
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 690-695
- ISSN
- 0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030104144
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- chronic widespread pain, middle-aged and older men, mental health, recent life events, comorbidities, psychosocial risk factors, physical health status, European Male Ageing Study, Eastern Europe, cross-national comparison
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Chronic Disease, Epidemiologic Methods, Europe, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review