Cited by 115Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchSystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesVasculitis and related conditions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The predictive value of fluctuations in IgM and IgG class anti-dsDNA antibodies for relapses in systemic lupus erythematosus. A prospective long-term observation

Open access
Bootsma, Hendrika, Spronk, Peter E, Borg, Evert J Ter, Hummel, Elsje J, de Boer, Greetje, Limburg, Pieter C, Kallenberg, Cees G M·1997·Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract

Objective This study investigated the predictive value of rises in IgM class antibodies against double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) for ensuing relapses in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in comparison with rises in IgG class antibodies. In addition, it was analysed whether rises in IgM class anti-dsDNA were associated with specific clinical manifestations of SLE. Methods Thirty four of a cohort of 72 SLE patients who were positive for IgM class anti-dsDNA at the start of the study or at the time of a relapse were analysed monthly for class specific anti-dsDNA levels during a median observation period of 19.6 months. Disease activity was scored according to the SLE Disease Activity Index. Anti-dsDNA were measured by IgM and IgG class enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and by Farr assay. Results During the study 18 of 34 patients experienced 26 relapses. Twenty two (85%) of the relapses were accompanied by a positive test for IgM class anti-dsDNA by ELISA, 23 (89%) were positive for IgG class anti-dsDNA by ELISA, and 25 (96%) were positive by Farr assay. Patients with rises in IgG class anti-dsDNA by ELISA or in anti-dsDNA by Farr assay had a significantly higher cumulative risk for relapses than patients without those increases (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively). This was not the case for rises in IgM class anti-dsDNA (p = 0.16). Moreover, a rise in IgM class anti-dsDNA before a relapse was not associated, expressed in terms of odds ratios, with specific clinical manifestations of SLE. Conclusion Relapses of SLE are frequently accompanied by IgM class anti-dsDNA. Rises of IgM class anti-dsDNA, in contrast with rises in IgG class anti-dsDNA, are not a sensitive tool for predicting a relapse and are not associated with specific clinical manifestations of SLE.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ard.56.11.661

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • dsDNA antibodies are among the most commonly detected ANAs in SLE and correlate with disease activity and especially renal involvement.

    “As double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies are among the most commonly detected ANAs in SLE, reported to correlate also with disease activity and especially renal involvement (6-9)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bootsma, H., Spronk, P. E., Borg, E. J. T., Hummel, E. J., de Boer, G., Limburg, P. C., & Kallenberg, C. G. M.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Bootsma, Hendrika
Venue
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-11
Volume
56
Issue
11
Pages
661-666
ISSN
0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129852468
Cited by
115
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
systemic lupus erythematosus, anti-dsDNA antibodies, recurrence, recurrence prediction, SLE disease activity index, clinical features
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Antinuclear, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Immunoglobulin M, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Radioimmunoprecipitation Assay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review