The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Population based assessment of diabetic retinopathy in an urban population in southern India
Open accessAbstract
AIM: To assess the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and the visual impairment caused by it in an urban population in southern India in order to determine its public health significance. METHODS: 2522 subjects (85.4% of those eligible), a representative sample of the population of Hyderabad city in southern India, underwent interview and detailed dilated eye examination during 1996-7 as part of the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. RESULTS: 124 subjects, all >/=30 years old, reported that they had diabetes, an age-sex adjusted prevalence of 7.82% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.76-9.88%) in this age group. Diabetes was diagnosed at age >/=30 years in all but two subjects. The duration since diagnosis of diabetes was <10 years in 75.6% and >/=15 years in 6.7%. Diabetic retinopathy was present in 28 subjects, 1.78% (95% CI 1.09-2.48%) of those >/=30 years old. Most of the diabetic retinopathy was of the mild (50%) or moderate (39.3%) non-proliferative type; one subject (3.6%) had proliferative retinopathy. Multiple logistic regression revealed that the odds of having diabetic retinopathy were significantly higher in those >/=50 years than in those 30-49 years old (odds ratio 7.78, 95% CI 2.92-20. 73). Three subjects had visual impairment between 6/12 and 6/38 in either eye due to diabetic retinopathy, 0.19% (95% CI 0-0.41%) of those >/=30 years old. CONCLUSION: Visual impairment due to diabetic retinopathy was relatively uncommon in this urban Indian population in 1996-7. However, this could change in the near future with an increase in duration of diabetes because of the anticipated aging of India's population and the recent suggestion of increase in diabetes prevalence in urban India, and therefore should be monitored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Racial Differences in the Cause-Specific Prevalence of Blindness in East Baltimore
Sommer, A., Tielsch, J. M., Katz, J., Quigley, H. A., Gottsch, J. D., Javitt, J. C., Martone, J. F., Royall, R. M., Witt, K. A., & Ezrine, S. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199111143252004 · Cited by 764
Cited by
Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy and macular oedema: A systematic review
Williams, R., Airey, M., Baxter, H., Forrester, J., Kennedy-Martin, T., & Girach, A. (2004) · Eye · doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6701476 · Cited by 472
Diabetic retinopathy management guidelines
Chakrabarti, R., Harper, C. A., & Keeffe, J. E. (2012) · Expert Review of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1586/eop.12.52 · Cited by 112
Rani, P. K., Raman, R., Sharma, V., Mahuli, S. V., Tarigopala, A., Sudhir, R. R., Kumaramanickavel, G., & Sharma, T. (2007) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.120659 · Cited by 51
Thapa, R., Joshi, D. M., Rizyal, A., Maharjan, N., & Joshi, R. D. (2014) · Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.3126/nepjoph.v6i1.10760 · Cited by 48
Wadhwani, M., Vashist, P., Singh, S. S., Gupta, N., Malhotra, S., Gupta, A., Shukla, P., Bhardwaj, A., & Gupta, V. (2018) · Tropical Medicine & International Health · doi:10.1111/tmi.13039 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Dandona, L., Dandona, R., Naduvilath, T. J., McCarty, C. A., & Rao, G. N.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1999-08-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 937-940
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125471627
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.