The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The importance of genes and environment for ocular refraction and its determiners: a population based study among 20-45 year old twins
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: To estimate the heritability for ocular refraction and its determiners in a population based cohort of 20-45 years old twins. METHODS: 114 twin pairs (53 monozygotic and 61 dizygotic) participated. Refraction was determined in cycloplegia and eye dimensions were measured with ultrasound. Educational length was assessed. The heritability was estimated employing aetiological model fitting. Evidence of gene-environment interaction was analysed. Correlations between intrapairwise differences in educational length and in refraction were evaluated. RESULTS: The heritability was between 0.89 and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.96) for refraction, total refraction, axial length, and radius of corneal curvature. Phenotypic variation was mostly due to additive genetic effects. Refraction revealed evidence of gene-environment interaction (r = -0.29 to -0.32; p <0.05). The heritability for anterior chamber depth and lens thickness was between 0.88 and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.96) and dominant genetic effects were the most likely explanation. There was no correlation between age and intrapairwise differences in refraction. The dizygotic twins had significant larger intrapairwise differences in educational length (p <0.05), but the differences were not correlated with differences in refraction. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate a high heritability for ocular refraction and its determiners and thus suggest that environmental impact on refraction is not significant. However, the epidemiological association between educational length (near work) and myopia, the evidence of increasing myopia prevalence within a few generations, and the theory of gene-environment interaction imply that some individuals might be genetically liable to develop myopia if exposed to certain environmental factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families
Neale, M. C., & Cardon, L. R. (1992) · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8018-2 · Cited by 4,005
Sutton, H. (1937) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1937.tb43685.x · Cited by 816
Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex
McGue, M., & Bouchard, T. J. (1984) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01080045 · Cited by 787
Angle, J., & Wissmann, D. A. (1980) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112889 · Cited by 194
Vogler, G. P. (1993) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01067561 · Cited by 182
van Alphen, G. W. H. M. (1961) · KARGER eBooks · doi:10.1159/isbn.978-3-318-00846-3 · Cited by 178
Kinge, B., Midelfart, A., Jacobsen, G., & Rystad, J. (2000) · Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078001026.x · Cited by 155
On Emmetropia and Ametropia (Part 1 of 4)
van Alphen, G. W. H. M. (2010) · Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1159/000304181 · Cited by 122
Jensen, H. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 113
[On the etiology of myopia. An epidemiological study].
Goldschmidt, E. (1968) · PubMed · Cited by 112
Cited by
Parental History of Myopia, Sports and Outdoor Activities, and Future Myopia
Jones, L. A., Sinnott, L. T., Mutti, D. O., Mitchell, G. L., Moeschberger, M. L., & Zadnik, K. (2007) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.06-1118 · Cited by 769
IMI – Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia
Troilo, D., Smith, E. L., Nickla, D. L., Ashby, R., Tkatchenko, A. V., Ostrin, L. A., Gawne, T. J., Pardue, M. T., Summers, J. A., Kee, C.-S., et al. (2019) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25967 · Cited by 487
Tedja, M. S., Haarman, A. E. G., Meester-Smoor, M. A., Kaprio, J., Mackey, D. A., Guggenheim, J. A., Hammond, C. J., Verhoeven, V. J. M., Klaver, C. C. W., & for the CREAM Consortium (2019) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25965 · Cited by 304
A Review of Current Concepts of the Etiology and Treatment of Myopia
Cooper, J., & Tkatchenko, A. V. (2018) · Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1097/icl.0000000000000499 · Cited by 293
Rethinking expertise: a multifactorial gene–environment interaction model of expert performance.
Ullén, F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Mosing, M. A. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000033 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyhne, N.
- Venue
- British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-12-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1470-1476
- ISSN
- 0007-1161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114212276
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The importance of genes and environment for ocular refraction and its determiners: a population based study among 20-45 year old twins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjo.85.12.1470
- The paper
- Lyhne, N. (2001). The importance of genes and environment for ocular refraction and its determiners: a population based study among 20-45 year old twins. British Journal of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.85.12.1470
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.