The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of a two dimensional analysis method as a screening and evaluation tool for anterior cruciate ligament injury
Open accessAbstract
Background: Increased knee valgus predicts the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, particularly in women. Reducing injury rates thus relies on detecting and continually evaluating people with relatively large valgus motions. Objectives: To examine the potential of a two dimensional (2D) video analysis method for screening for excessive valgus. Methods: Ten female and 10 male National Collegiate Athletic Association basketball players had three dimensional (3D) knee valgus and two dimensional (2D) frontal plane knee angle quantified during side step, side jump, and shuttle run tasks. 3D valgus was quantified from external marker coordinates using standard techniques, and 2D data were obtained from both the frontal plane projections of these coordinates (2D-Mot) and manual digitisation of digital video footage (2D-Cam). A root mean square (RMS) error was calculated between 2D-Mot and 2D-Cam data to evaluate the reliability of the latter. Correlations between 2D-Cam and 3D data (intersubject and intrasubject) were also conducted, and regression slope and r 2 values obtained. Results: 2D-Cam and 2D-Mot data were consistent for side step (RMS = 1.7°) and side jump (RMS = 1.5°) movements. Between subjects, 2D-Cam and 3D data correlated well for the side step (r 2 = 0.58) and side jump (r 2 = 0.64). Within subjects, 2D-Cam and 3D data correlated moderately for the side step (r 2 = 0.25 (0.19)) and side jump (r 2 = 0.36 (0.27)). Conclusions: The 2D-Cam method can be used to screen for excessive valgus in elite basketball players, particularly for movements occurring primarily in the frontal plane. This method may also be a useful training evaluation tool when large reductions in dynamic valgus motions are required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hewett, T. E., Myer, G. D., Ford, K. R., Heidt, R. S., Colosimo, A. J., McLean, S. G., van den Bogert, A. J., Paterno, M. V., & Succop, P. (2005) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546504269591 · Cited by 3,577
Self-citation
Cited by
Utility of the Frontal Plane Projection Angle in Females With Patellofemoral Pain
Willson, J. D., & Davis, I. S. (2008) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2008.2706 · Cited by 251
Stensrud, S., Myklebust, G., Kristianslund, E., Bahr, R., & Krosshaug, T. (2011) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2010.078287 · Cited by 175
Lopes, T. J. A., Ferrari, D., Ioannidis, J., Simic, M., Mícolis de Azevedo, F., & Pappas, E. (2018) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.8006 · Cited by 48
Ireland, M. L., Bolgla, L. A., & Noehren, B. (2018) · ACL Injuries in the Female Athlete · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-56558-2_13 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- McLean, S. G., Walker, K., Ford, K. R., Myer, G. D., Hewett, T. E., & van den Bogert, A. J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2005-05-23
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 355-362
- ISSN
- 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0480
- OpenAlex
- W2135491888
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of a two dimensional analysis method as a screening and evaluation tool for anterior cruciate ligament injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bjsm.2005.018598
- The paper
- McLean, S. G., Walker, K., Ford, K. R., Myer, G. D., Hewett, T. E., & van den Bogert, A. J. (2005). Evaluation of a two dimensional analysis method as a screening and evaluation tool for anterior cruciate ligament injury. British Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2005.018598
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.