CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Computerised cognitive assessment of athletes with sports related head injury

Collie, A, Darby, D, Maruff, P·2001·British Journal of Sports Medicine
DOI 10.1136/bjsm.35.5.297
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Professional and amateur participants in many sports are at risk of brain injury caused by impact with other players or objects. In many cases, mild cognitive deficits may persist after the common neurological signs of brain injury have passed. In recent years, the athlete's cognitive status after concussion has been measured with conventional “paper and pencil” neuropsychological tests. However, such tests are not ideal for sporting settings, as they are designed for the detection of gross cognitive impairments at a single assessment, not for the identification of mild cognitive deficits on repeated assessment. A number of computerised cognitive assessment tests and test batteries have been developed over the past two decades. These batteries offer major scientific and practical advantages over conventional neuropsychological tests which make them ideal for the assessment of cognitive function in sportspeople. This review first describes the problems associated with cognitive assessment of people with sports related cognitive deficits, and then critically examines the utility of conventional neuropsychological and computerised cognitive tests in sporting settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsm.35.5.297

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 1998, Neurology, 50, 677, 10.1212/WNL.50.3.677 · DOI
  2. 1999, J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 21, 70, 10.1076/jcen.21.1.70.945 · DOI
  3. 1993, Aust Fam Physician, 22, 750
  4. 10.1136/bjsm.28.3.187 · DOI
  5. 1991, Undersea Biomed Res, 18, 1
  6. 1989, Neurology, 39, 210, 10.1212/WNL.39.2.210 · DOI
  7. 1998, Neurology, 51, 791, 10.1212/WNL.51.3.791 · DOI
  8. 1997, J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 19, 275, 10.1080/01688639708403857 · DOI
  9. 10.1097/00006123-199609000-00014 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/026990596124584 · DOI
  11. 1995, Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine, 5, 32, 10.1097/00042752-199501000-00006 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0278-5919(05)70059-4 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 1975, Lancet, ii, 995
  14. 10.1093/brain/111.3.695 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1080/13854049308401901 · DOI
  16. 2001, Neurology, 56, 1533, 10.1212/WNL.56.11.1533 · DOI
  17. McCaffrey RJ, Duff K, Westervelt HJ. Practitioner's guide to evaluating change with neuropsychological assessment instruments. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2000. · DOI
  18. 1997, Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioural Neurology, 10, 247
  19. 10.1136/jnnp.52.6.742 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1037//0894-4105.8.3.316 · DOI
  21. 1988, Neurosurgery, 22, 853, 10.1227/00006123-198805000-00006 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hartly LR. Prescribed psychotropic drugs. The major and the minor tranquilisers. In: Smith DM, Jones AP, eds. Handbook of human performance; vol 2. London: Academic Press, 1992. · DOI
  23. Finnegan F, Hammersley R. The effects of alcohol on performance. In: Smith DM, Jones AP, eds. Handbook of human performance; vol 2. London: Academic Press, 1992. · DOI
  24. 1991, J Clin Psychol, 47, 790, 10.1002/1097-4679(199111)47:6<790::AID-JCLP2270470610>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
  25. 10.1080/13854049208404115 · DOI
  26. 2001, Australian Defence Force Health, 2, 29
  27. 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00131.x · DOI
  28. 10.1007/BF01108787 · DOI
  29. 1998, J Head Trauma Rehabil, 13, 36

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Collie, A., Darby, D., & Maruff, P.
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2001-10
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
297-302
ISSN
  • 0306-3674
  • 1473-0480
DOI
10.1136/bjsm.35.5.297
Cited by
171
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review