Cited by 89Osteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPharmacological Effects of Medicinal Plants

The effect of glucosamine supplementation on people experiencing regular knee pain

Open access
Braham, R, Dawson, B, Goodman, C·2003·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Objective:The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of oral glucosamine supplementation on the functional ability and degree of pain felt by individuals who had regular knee pain, most likely due to previous articular cartilage damage, and possibly osteoarthritis. Methods:Subjects were randomly supplemented with either glucosamine (G) (n=24) or placebo (P) (lactose) (n=22) for 12 weeks at a dose of 2000 mg per day. Over this period, four testing sessions were conducted, with changes in knee pain and function assessed by clinical and functional tests, (joint line palpation, a 3 metre “duck walk” and a repeated, walking stair climb), two questionnaires (the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Knee Pain Scale (KPS)) and participant subjective evaluations. Results:The clinical and functional test scores improved with time (main effects: p<0.05, p<0.01) but there were no significant differences between the two groups. The questionnaire results also recorded a significant main effect for time (p<0.05), but the glucosamine group was found to have significantly better KOOS quality of life scores at week eight and 12 (p<0.05), and lower KPS scores (p<0.05) at week eight than the placebo group. On self report evaluations of changes across the 12 week supplementation period, 88% (n=21) of the glucosamine group reported some degree of improvement in their knee pain versus only 17% (n=3) in the placebo group. Conclusions:These results suggest that glucosamine supplementation can provide some degree of pain relief and improved function in persons who experience regular knee pain, which may be caused by prior cartilage injury and/or osteoarthritis. The trends in the results also suggest that, at a dosage of 2000 mg per day, the majority of improvements are present after eight weeks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsm.37.1.45

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Glucosamine and chondroitin have been reported to slow cartilage degeneration and reduce the degree of joint pain in active individuals which may help athletes postpone and/or prevent joint problems.

    “Glucosamine and chondroitin have been reported to slow cartilage degeneration and reduce the degree of joint pain in active individuals which may help athletes postpone and/or prevent joint problems [692, 693].”

    From ISSN exercise &amp; sports nutrition review update: research &amp; recommendations (2018) · cites this paper as [692]

    The Abstract reports that glucosamine supplementation provided some pain relief in people with regular knee pain and describes limiting cartilage degeneration as a potential benefit. The Discussion says effects on cartilage integrity await further research. The paper does not establish that chondroitin has these effects or that either supplement prevents joint problems in athletes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Davis M, Ettinger W, Neuhaus J, et al. Knee osteoarthritis and physical functioning: evidence from NHAHES I Epidemilogic followup study. J Rheumatol 1990;18:591-8.
  2. Barclay T, Tsourounis C, McCart G. Glucosamine. Ann Pharmacother 1998;32:574-9.
  3. da Camara C, Dowless G. Glucosamine sulphate for osteoarthritis. Ann Pharmacother 1998;32:580-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braham, R., Dawson, B., & Goodman, C.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Braham, R
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-02
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
45-49
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2132274011
Cited by
89
References
20
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacological Effects of Medicinal Plants
Keywords
glucosamine, knee pain, osteoarthritis, articular cartilage damage, knee function, analgesia, dietary supplementation, KOOS, placebo comparison
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Chronic Disease, Exercise Test, Female, Glucosamine, Humans, Knee Joint, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Arthralgia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review