CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 151Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

PCSK9 inhibitors and ezetimibe with or without statin therapy for cardiovascular risk reduction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Open access
Khan, Safi U, Yedlapati, Siva H, Lone, Ahmad N, Hao, Qiukui, Guyatt, Gordon, Delvaux, Nicolas, Bekkering, Geertruida E (Trudy), Vandvik, Per Olav +4 more·2022·BMJ
DOI 10.1136/bmj-2021-069116
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes in adults taking maximally tolerated statin therapy or who are statin intolerant. DESIGN: Network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to 31 December 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials of ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors with ≥500 patients and follow-up of ≥6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We performed frequentist fixed-effects network meta-analysis and GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation) to assess certainty of evidence. Results included relative risks (RR) and absolute risks per 1000 patients treated for five years for non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. We estimated absolute risk differences assuming constant RR (estimated from network meta-analysis) across different baseline therapies and cardiovascular risk thresholds; the PREDICT risk calculator estimated cardiovascular risk in primary and secondary prevention. Patients were categorised at low to very high cardiovascular risk. A guideline panel and systematic review authors established the minimal important differences (MID) of 12 per 1000 for MI and 10 per 1000 for stroke. RESULTS: We identified 14 trials assessing ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors among 83 660 adults using statins. Adding ezetimibe to statins reduced MI (RR 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.80 to 0.94)) and stroke (RR 0.82 (0.71 to 0.96)) but not all-cause mortality (RR 0.99 (0.92 to 1.06)) or cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.97 (0.87 to 1.09)). Similarly, adding PCSK9 inhibitor to statins reduced MI (0.81 (0.76 to 0.87)) and stroke (0.74 (0.64 to 0.85)) but not all-cause (0.95 (0.87 to 1.03)) or cardiovascular mortality (0.95 (0.87 to 1.03)). Among adults with very high cardiovascular risk, adding PCSK9 inhibitor was likely to reduce MI (16 per 1000) and stroke (21 per 1000) (moderate to high certainty); whereas adding ezetimibe was likely to reduce stroke (14 per 1000), but the reduction of MI (11 per 1000) (moderate certainty) did not reach MID. Adding ezetimibe to PCSK9 inhibitor and statin may reduce stroke (11 per 1000), but the reduction of MI (9 per 1000) (low certainty) did not reach MID. Adding PCSK9 inhibitors to statins and ezetimibe may reduce MI (14 per 1000) and stroke (17 per 1000) (low certainty). Among adults with high cardiovascular risk, adding PCSK9 inhibitor probably reduced MI (12 per 1000) and stroke (16 per 1000) (moderate certainty); adding ezetimibe probably reduced stroke (11 per 1000), but the reduction in MI did not achieve MID (8 per 1000) (moderate certainty). Adding ezetimibe to PCSK9 inhibitor and statins did not reduce outcomes beyond MID, while adding PCSK9 inhibitor to ezetimibe and statins may reduce stroke (13 per 1000). These effects were consistent in statin-intolerant patients. Among moderate and low cardiovascular risk groups, adding PCSK9 inhibitor or ezetimibe to statins yielded little or no benefit for MI and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors may reduce non-fatal MI and stroke in adults at very high or high cardiovascular risk who are receiving maximally tolerated statin therapy or are statin-intolerant, but not in those with moderate and low cardiovascular risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj-2021-069116

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis suggests that there is a cardiovascular benefit of adding ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors to treatment for people at high risk.

    “A meta-analysis suggests that there is a cardiovascular benefit of adding ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors to treatment for people at high risk (111).”

    From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [111]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pfizer. Pfizer discontinues global development of bococizumab. its investigational PCSK9 inhibitor. 2016. https://www.pfizer.com/news/ press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer_discontinues_global_ development_of_bococizumab_its_investigational_pcsk9_inhibitor.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Khan, S. U., Yedlapati, S. H., Lone, A. N., Hao, Q., Guyatt, G., Delvaux, N., Bekkering, G. E. (., Vandvik, P. O., Riaz, I. B., Li, S., Aertgeerts, B., & Rodondi, N.
Affiliations
  • Houston Methodist (US)
  • Erie County Medical Center (US)
  • Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital (US)
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Khan, Safi U
ORCID
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-05-04
Volume
377
Pages
e069116
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1136/bmj-2021-069116
OpenAlex
W4229000569
Cited by
151
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 15
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Keywords
PCSK9 inhibitors, ezetimibe, statin therapy, statin intolerance, cardiovascular risk reduction, myocardial infarction, stroke, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, hypercholesterolemia, LDL cholesterol lowering, minimal important difference, cardiovascular disease prevention, combination lipid-lowering therapy, LDL cholesterol targets
MeSH terms
Ezetimibe, Proprotein Convertase 9, Heart Disease Risk Factors, PCSK9 Inhibitors, Adult, Anticholesteremic Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Myocardial Infarction, Risk Factors, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review