Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in China, 2004-18: findings from six rounds of a national survey

Open access
Zhang, Mei, Shi, Yu, Zhou, Bin, Huang, Zhengjing, Zhao, Zhenping, Li, Chun, Zhang, Xiao, Han, Guiyuan, Peng, Ke, Li, Xinhua, Wang, Youfa, Ezzati, Majid, Wang, Limin, Li, Yichong·2023·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To assess the recent trends in prevalence and management of hypertension in China, nationally and by population subgroups. Design: Six rounds of a national survey, China. Setting: China Chronic Disease and Risk Factors Surveillance, 2004-18. Participants: 642 523 community dwelling adults aged 18-69 years (30 501 in 2004, 47 353 in 2007, 90 491 in 2010, 156 836 in 2013, 162 293 in 2015, and 155 049 in 2018). Main outcome measures: Hypertension was defined as a blood pressure of ≥140/90 mm Hg or taking antihypertensive drugs. The main outcome measures were hypertension prevalence and proportion of people with hypertension who were aware of their hypertension, who were treated for hypertension, and whose blood pressure was controlled below 140/90 mm Hg. Results: The standardised prevalence of hypertension in adults aged 18-69 years in China increased from 20.8% (95% confidence interval 19.0% to 22.5%) in 2004 to 29.6% (27.8% to 31.3%) in 2010, then decreased to 24.7% (23.2% to 26.1%) in 2018. During 2010-18, the absolute annual decline in prevalence of hypertension among women was more than twice that among men (−0.83 percentage points (95% confidence interval −1.13 to −0.52) v −0.40 percentage points (−0.73 to −0.07)). Despite modest improvements in the awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension since 2004, rates remained low in 2018, at 38.3% (36.3% to 40.4%), 34.6% (32.6% to 36.7%), and 12.0% (10.6% to 13.4%). Of 274 million (95% confidence interval 238 to 311 million) adults aged 18-69 years with hypertension in 2018, control was inadequate in an estimated 240 million (215 to 264 million). Across all surveys, women with low educational attainment had higher prevalence of hypertension than those with higher education, but the finding was mixed for men. The gap in hypertension control between urban and rural areas persisted, despite larger improvements in diagnosis and control in rural than in urban areas. Conclusions: The prevalence of hypertension in China has slightly declined since 2010, but treatment and control remain low. The findings highlight the need for improving detection and treatment of hypertension through the strengthening of primary care in China, especially in rural areas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj-2022-071952

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, M., Shi, Y., Zhou, B., Huang, Z., Zhao, Z., Li, C., Zhang, X., Han, G., Peng, K., Li, X., Wang, Y., Ezzati, M., Wang, L., & Li, Y.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2023-01-11
Volume
380
Pages
e071952
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4315631210
Cited by
300
References
53
FWCI
52.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in China, 2004-18: findings from six rounds of a national survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj-2022-071952
The paper
Zhang, M., Shi, Y., Zhou, B., Huang, Z., Zhao, Z., Li, C., Zhang, X., Han, G., Peng, K., Li, X., Wang, Y., Ezzati, M., Wang, L., & Li, Y. (2023). Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in China, 2004-18: findings from six rounds of a national survey. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-071952

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.