The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prospective trial of oestrogen and calcium in postmenopausal women.
Open accessAbstract
In a prospective trial in 72 postmenopausal women to compare the effects on bone loss of no treatment, treatment with oestrogen, and treatment with calcium the women were followed up for at least two years and examined densitometrically and morphometrically. Women in the untreated control group continued to lose bone during the two years, whereas the oestrogen-treated group lost none. Loss in the calcium-treated group was intermediate. Oestrogen appeared to inhibit endosteal bone resorption and may have stimulated subperiosteal bone apposition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prevention of spinal osteoporosis in oophorectomised women
Lindsay, R., Hart, D. M., Forrest, C., & Baird, C. (1980) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(80)92592-1 · Cited by 706
Avian osteoclasts as estrogen target cells.
Oursler, M. J., Osdoby, P., Pyfferoen, J., Riggs, B. L., & Spelsberg, T. C. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.15.6613 · Cited by 395
Smoking and Age at Menopause in Women
McKINLAY, S. M., BIFANO, N. L., & McKINLAY, J. B. (1985) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-103-3-350 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Horsman, A., Gallagher, J. C., Simpson, M., & Nordin, B. E.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1977-09-24
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6090
- Pages
- 789-792
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2078629144
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
