The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The sick building syndrome: prevalence studies.
Open accessAbstract
Random samples or the entire workforce in nine offices in which similar clerical work was being performed were studied using a doctor administered questionnaire that inquired into symptoms that have been linked with the "sick building syndrome." Five of the offices were fully air conditioned, one had recirculation of air and mechanical ventilation, and three were naturally ventilated. Workers in three air conditioned and three naturally ventilated buildings were interviewed blind. Seven of the buildings were studied at our request in the absence of any known problem. Comparison of prevalences of symptoms between the naturally ventilated and the other buildings showed a repeated pattern of nasal, eye, and mucous membrane symptoms with lethargy, dry skin, and headaches. There were highly significant excesses of these six symptoms in the air conditioned buildings when compared by chi 2 tests with the naturally ventilated buildings. It is suggested that these six symptoms represent the sick building syndrome and that the size of the problem is probably greater than is currently recognised. Possible causes are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Case Control Etiologic Study of Sarcoidosis: Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors
Newman, L. S., Rose, C. S., Bresnitz, E. A., Rossman, M. D., Barnard, J., Frederick, M., Terrin, M. L., Weinberger, S. E., Moller, D. R., McLennan, G., et al. (2004) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200402-249oc · Cited by 801
Ramponi, R., & Blocken, B. (2012) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.01.004 · Cited by 555
Senses of place: architectural design for the multisensory mind
Spence, C. (2020) · Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-020-00243-4 · Cited by 380
Correlation between the prevalence of certain fungi and sick building syndrome.
Cooley, J. D., Wong, W. C., Jumper, C. A., & Straus, D. C. (1998) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.55.9.579 · Cited by 329
Non-Specific Symptoms In Office Workers: A Review And Summary Of The Epidemiologic Literature
Mendell, M. J. (1993) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.1993.00003.x · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Finnegan, M. J., Pickering, C. A., & Burge, P. S.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1984-12-08
- Volume
- 289
- Issue
- 6458
- Pages
- 1573-1575
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2029495550
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The sick building syndrome: prevalence studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.289.6458.1573
- The paper
- Finnegan, M. J., Pickering, C. A., & Burge, P. S. (1984). The sick building syndrome: prevalence studies. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.289.6458.1573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.