Cited by 105Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationSimulation-Based Education in HealthcarePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Inability of trained nurses to perform basic life support

Open access
Wynne, G, Marteau, T M, Johnston, M, Whiteley, C A, Evans, T R·1987·BMJ

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.294.6581.1198

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wynne, G., Marteau, T. M., Johnston, M., Whiteley, C. A., & Evans, T. R.
Affiliations
Leeds General Infirmary (GB)
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1987-05-09
Volume
294
Issue
6581
Pages
1198-1199
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2021484665
Cited by
105
References
4
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
13.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
basic life support, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, nurses, resuscitation skills, skill retention
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Heart Arrest, Humans, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Resuscitation, Self-Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review