The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A prospective study of maternal and fetal outcome in acute Lassa fever infection during pregnancy.
Open accessAbstract
Several viral infections have been reported to result in more severe disease in pregnant than non-pregnant women, but the relative risks have not been well characterised. This has now been done for Lassa fever in a prospective study of 68 pregnant and 79 non-pregnant women who were admitted to hospital in Sierra Leone with confirmed Lassa fever. Lassa fever was the main cause of maternal mortality in the hospital, accounting for 25% of maternal deaths. Twelve of 40 patients in the third trimester died, compared with two of 28 in the first two trimesters and 10 of 79 non-pregnant women. The odds ratio for death in the third trimester compared with the first two trimesters was 5.57 (95% confidence intervals 1.02 to 30.26). The condition of the mother improved rapidly after evacuation of the uterus, whether by spontaneous abortion, evacuation of retained products of conception, or normal delivery; 10 of 26 women without uterine evacuation died, but only four of 39 women with evacuation died (p = 0.0016). The odds ratio for death with pregnancy intact was 5.47 (95% confidence interval 1.35 to 22.16). Fetal and neonatal loss was 87%. The risk of death from Lassa fever in the third trimester is significantly higher than that in the first two trimesters and higher than that for non-pregnant women, but evacuation of the uterus can significantly improve the mother's chance of survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
REVIEW ARTICLE: The Immune System in Pregnancy: A Unique Complexity
Mor, G., & Cardenas, I. (2010) · American Journal of Reproductive Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00836.x · Cited by 1,431
The unique immunological and microbial aspects of pregnancy
Mor, G., Aldo, P., & Alvero, A. B. (2017) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2017.64 · Cited by 1,041
Emerging Infections and Pregnancy
Jamieson, D. J., Theiler, R. N., & Rasmussen, S. A. (2006) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1211.060152 · Cited by 588
Lassa fever: epidemiology, clinical features, and social consequences
Kay Richmond, J., & Baglole, D. J. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1271 · Cited by 459
Risks associated with viral infections during pregnancy
Racicot, K., & Mor, G. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci87490 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Price, M. E., Fisher-Hoch, S. P., Craven, R. B., & McCormick, J. B.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1988-09-03
- Volume
- 297
- Issue
- 6648
- Pages
- 584-587
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2044764751
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective study of maternal and fetal outcome in acute Lassa fever infection during pregnancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.297.6648.584
- The paper
- Price, M. E., Fisher-Hoch, S. P., Craven, R. B., & McCormick, J. B. (1988). A prospective study of maternal and fetal outcome in acute Lassa fever infection during pregnancy. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.297.6648.584
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.