The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of bone density in normal women: risk factors for future osteoporosis?
Open accessAbstract
Postmenopausal osteoporosis is an important public health problem in developed countries. Preventive treatment might effect a large reduction in the incidence, but this needs to be applied selectively to those women at increased risk. Loss of bone density results in an increased risk of fractures in the classical sites of vertebrae and proximal femur. A cross sectional study of bone density measurements was carried out in these sites in British women with a modern, precise densitometric technique. Possible predictors and risk factors for bone density were assessed in these women. Bone density was measured by dual photon absorptiometry in 284 apparently healthy women volunteers aged 21 to 68. The values obtained were similar to those obtained from equivalent studies performed in women in the United States. Peak adult bone density had been attained soon after the end of linear skeletal growth. Thereafter there was some decline with age in the proximal femur, but the major fall in bone density in all sites was related to the menopause. Other factors decreasing bone density, and hence increasing risk for osteoporosis, such as low body weight, alcohol and cigarette consumption, nulliparity, lack of previous use of oral contraceptives, and lack of regular exercise, seemed to be important. None, however, could predict satisfactorily women at future risk for osteoporosis. Direct measurements of bone density in the clinically relevant sites are necessary to determine which women should received preventive treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. This would help make such treatment more cost effective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LONG-TERM PREVENTION OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS BY ŒSTROGEN
Lindsay, R., Aitken, J. M., Anderson, L. B., Hart, D. M., Macdonald, E. B., & Clarke, A. C. (1976) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(76)92217-0 · Cited by 952
Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur and Spine with Aging
Riggs, B. L., Wahner, H. W., Seeman, E., Offord, K. P., Dunn, W. L., Mazess, R. B., Johnson, K. A., & Melton, L. J. (1982) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci110667 · Cited by 816
GENANT, H. K., CANN, C. E., ETTINGER, B., & GORDAN, G. S. (1982) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-97-5-699 · Cited by 656
Genetic Factors in Determining Bone Mass
Smith, D. M., Nance, W. E., Kang, K. W., Christian, J. C., & Johnston, C. C. (1973) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci107476 · Cited by 579
Evidence for two distinct syndromes of involutional osteoporosis
Riggs, B. L., & Melton, L. J. (1983) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(83)90860-4 · Cited by 544
Riggs, B. L., Wahner, H. W., Melton, L. J., Richelson, L. S., Judd, H. L., & Offord, K. P. (1986) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci112462 · Cited by 510
Differential effects of endocrine dysfunction on the axial and the appendicular skeleton.
Seeman, E., Wahner, H. W., Offord, K. P., Kumar, R., Johnson, W. J., & Riggs, B. L. (1982) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci110570 · Cited by 463
PREDICTION OF RAPID BONE LOSS IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN
Christiansen, C., Riis, B. J., & Rødbro, P. (1987) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91671-0 · Cited by 364
Krølner, B., & Nielsen, S. P. (1982) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs0620329 · Cited by 344
Daniell (1976) · doi:10.1001/archinte.1976.03630030032007 · Cited by 301
Cited by
Maternal Mineral and Bone Metabolism During Pregnancy, Lactation, and Post-Weaning Recovery
Kovacs, C. S. (2016) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00027.2015 · Cited by 544
A meta-analysis of the effects of cigarette smoking on bone mineral density
Ward, K. D., & Klesges, R. C. (2001) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/bf02390832 · Cited by 530
Nordin, B. E. C. (1997) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/s0899-9007(97)83011-0 · Cited by 367
Calcium intake and bone mass: A quantitative review of the evidence
Graham Cumming, R. (1990) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/bf02555919 · Cited by 342
Rizzoli, R., Stevenson, J. C., Bauer, J. M., van Loon, L. J. C., Walrand, S., Kanis, J. A., Cooper, C., Brandi, M.-L., Diez-Perez, A., & Reginster, J.-Y. (2014) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.07.005 · Cited by 291
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevenson, J. C., Lees, B., Devenport, M., Cust, M. P., & Ganger, K. F.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1989-04-08
- Volume
- 298
- Issue
- 6678
- Pages
- 924-928
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2047516621
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 35.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of bone density in normal women: risk factors for future osteoporosis? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.298.6678.924
- The paper
- Stevenson, J. C., Lees, B., Devenport, M., Cust, M. P., & Ganger, K. F. (1989). Determinants of bone density in normal women: risk factors for future osteoporosis? BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.298.6678.924
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.