The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differential effects of endocrine dysfunction on the axial and the appendicular skeleton.
Open accessAbstract
In 100 patients with various types of endocrine dysfunction, we measured bone mineral density (BMD) at the midradius (greater than 95% cortical bone) and distal radius (75% cortical and 25% trabecular bone) by single photon absorptiometry and at the lumbar spine (greater than 66% trabecular bone) using the new technique of dual photon absorptiometry. BMD in each endocrine disorder deviated in at least one site from the sex-specific age regression of 187 normal subjects. For patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, hypercortisolism, and hyperthyroidism this deviation was negative (suggesting bone loss), whereas for patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism due to chronic renal failure, acromegaly, and postsurgical hypoparathyroidism it was positive (suggesting bone gain). When all six states of endocrine dysfunction were compared concomitantly by multivariate analysis of variance, the profile of the changes in BMD differed significantly (P less than 0.001), indicating a nonuniform response of bone to the various hormonal alterations. When values for BMD at each of the three scanning sites were compared the midradius and distal radius did not differ significantly; either of the radius measurements, however, differed significantly (P less than 0.001) from the lumbar spine. Thus, the BMD of the axial skeleton cannot be reliably predicted from measurements made in the appendicular skeleton. We conclude that the effects of endocrine dysfunction on bone density are complex and are both disease and site specific.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ohlsson, C., Bengtsson, B.-A., Isaksson, O. G. P., Andreassen, T. T., & Slootweg, M. C. (1998) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.19.1.0324 · Cited by 855
Determinants of bone density in normal women: risk factors for future osteoporosis?
Stevenson, J. C., Lees, B., Devenport, M., Cust, M. P., & Ganger, K. F. (1989) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.298.6678.924 · Cited by 406
Prevalence of Vertebral Fractures in Men with Acromegaly
Mazziotti, G., Bianchi, A., Bonadonna, S., Cimino, V., Patelli, I., Fusco, A., Pontecorvi, A., De Marinis, L., & Giustina, A. (2008) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0791 · Cited by 169
Diamond, T., Nery, L., & Posen, S. (1989) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-111-7-567 · Cited by 147
Richy, F., Ethgen, O., Bruyere, O., & Reginster, J.-Y. (2004) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-003-1570-5 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Seeman, E., Wahner, H. W., Offord, K. P., Kumar, R., Johnson, W. J., & Riggs, B. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1982-06-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1302-1309
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114712941
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential effects of endocrine dysfunction on the axial and the appendicular skeleton. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci110570
- The paper
- Seeman, E., Wahner, H. W., Offord, K. P., Kumar, R., Johnson, W. J., & Riggs, B. L. (1982). Differential effects of endocrine dysfunction on the axial and the appendicular skeleton. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci110570
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.