Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hepatotoxicity of herbal remedies.

Open access
MacGregor, F. B., Abernethy, V. E., Dahabra, S., Cobden, I., Hayes, P. C.·1989·BMJ

Abstract

Background Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathological disease characterised by oesophageal eosinophilia and gastrointestinal symptoms. It is caused by immunologic reactions to ingested and inhaled allergens. The diagnosis is considered if at least 15 eosinophils are detected per high-powered field in mucosal biopsies. Purpose To describe and evaluate the efficacy of oral viscous budesonide for EoE in paediatric patients. Materials and methods Patient, 11 years old, diagnosed with EoE, persistent atopic asthma and pollen rhinoconjunctivitis, with multiple food allergies. He initiated a restricted-foods diet and drug treatment with Montelukast 10 mcg/24 h, Fluticasone 50 mcg twice daily and on-demand salbutamol inhalation, which failed, although there was some clinical improvement. Therefore, treatment with budesonide suspension was initiated 0.5 mcg twice daily, 1 h after meals. Budesonide suspension is a viscous liquid consisting of budesonide nebulizer suspension (Pulmicort respules 0.50mg/ml) mixed with sodium benzoate sodium, saccharin, and glycerine with constant stirring until blended. Finally add the strawberry essence and incorporate xanthan gum on top without mixing and add water to 240 ml. The final concentration is 0.25 mg/ml. Results In our present medical case, the patient presented eosinophilic enteritis and esophagitis, despite having been treated with omeprazole, antihistamines, and dietary advice. Between April 2013 and May 2013, he had been receiving, budesonide 500 mcg/12 hourly and dietary treatment. He had a significant improvement. After the treatment the endoscopy was completely normalised. Unfortunately, 3 months later after stopping the oral steroids the patient reported recurrence of symptoms. Conclusions As with most eosinophilic diseases, oral steroids improve oesophageal eosinophilic and symptoms in patients with EoE. Treatment with budesonide induced full remission in the patient. Unfortunately, the therapeutic effect of oral steroids on the disease is abolished following cessation of treatment. Therefore, patients may have to continue on therapeutic treatment levels for an indefinite amount of time No conflict of interest.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.299.6708.1156

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
MacGregor, F. B., Abernethy, V. E., Dahabra, S., Cobden, I., & Hayes, P. C.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1989-11-04
Volume
299
Issue
6708
Pages
1156-1157
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2018310243
Cited by
311
References
41
FWCI
7.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatotoxicity of herbal remedies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.299.6708.1156
The paper
MacGregor, F. B., Abernethy, V. E., Dahabra, S., Cobden, I., & Hayes, P. C. (1989). Hepatotoxicity of herbal remedies. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.299.6708.1156

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.