Cited by 504Medical Coding and Health InformationElectronic Health Records SystemsNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

The Read clinical classification.

Open access
Chisholm, J·1990·BMJ

Abstract

The NHS has acquired a coding system designed for the computer age

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.300.6732.1092

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although it has been suggested that second-generation antipsychotics reduce mortality overall, polypharmacy and higher drug dosages may increase it.

    “Although it has been suggested that second-generation antipsychotics reduce mortality overall,6 polypharmacy and higher drug dosages may increase it.60”

    From Mortality gap for people with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: UK-based cohort study 2000–2014 (2017) · cites this paper as [60]

    Citation 60 is attached to the claim that polypharmacy and higher drug dosages may increase mortality. The paper’s opening passage (page not provided) describes the Read clinical coding system, and searches for antipsychotics, polypharmacy, dosage, and mortality found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chisholm, J.
Corresponding author
Chisholm, J
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1990-04-28
Volume
300
Issue
6732
Pages
1092-1092
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2033945449
Cited by
504
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
read classification, medical coding, National Health Service, electronic health records, clinical classification systems
MeSH terms
Disease, United Kingdom, Humans, Information Systems, State Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review