The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence of asthma in Finnish young men.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE--To determine the prevalence of asthma in cohorts of Finnish young men in the period 1926-89. DESIGN--A retrospective analysis using reports and statistics of Finnish defence forces. SETTING--Call up examinations of candidates for military conscription and examination of conscripts discharged because of poor health. SUBJECTS--Roughly 900,000 men--that is, 98% of men of conscription age--examined in 1966-89 and a proportional but unknown number examined in 1926-61. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Asthma recognised at call up examination, exemption from military service, and discharge from military service because of asthma. RESULTS--During 1926-61 the prevalence of asthma recorded at call up examinations remained steady at between 0.02% and 0.08%. Between 1961 and 1966, however, a continuous, linear rise began, the prevalence increasing from 0.29% in 1966 to 1.79% in 1989--that is, representing a sixfold increase. Compared with 1961 the rise was 20-fold. From 1966 to 1989 the sum of exemptions and discharges from military service due to asthma increased analogously sixfold. CONCLUSIONS--If the apparent increase in asthma detected in Finnish young men was due entirely to improved diagnostic methods and other confounding effects then some 95% of cases must have gone undiagnosed in the years before 1966. This seems inconceivable, which suggests that much of the increase was real. This conclusion is strengthened by the observed rise in exemptions and discharges due to asthma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC): rationale and methods
Asher, M., Keil, U., Anderson, H., Beasley, R., Crane, J., Martinez, F., Mitchell, E., Pearce, N., Sibbald, B., Stewart, A., et al. (1995) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.95.08030483 · Cited by 3,724
Eder, W., Ege, M. J., & von Mutius, E. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra054308 · Cited by 1,621
(1996) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.96.09040687 · Cited by 1,002
Mapping urban air pollution using GIS: a regression-based approach
BRIGGS, D. J., COLLINS, S., ELLIOTT, P., FISCHER, P., KINGHAM, S., LEBRET, E., PRYL, K., VAN REEUWIJK, H., SMALLBONE, K., & VAN DER VEEN, A. (1997) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/136588197242158 · Cited by 666
Asthma in adults and its association with chronic rhinosinusitis: The GA 2 LEN survey in Europe
Jarvis, D., Newson, R., Lotvall, J., Hastan, D., Tomassen, P., Keil, T., Gjomarkaj, M., Forsberg, B., Gunnbjornsdottir, M., Minov, J., et al. (2012) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02709.x · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Haahtela, T., Lindholm, H., Björkstén, F., Koskenvuo, K., & Laitinen, L. A.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1990-08-04
- Volume
- 301
- Issue
- 6746
- Pages
- 266-268
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1975847487
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of asthma in Finnish young men. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.301.6746.266
- The paper
- Haahtela, T., Lindholm, H., Björkstén, F., Koskenvuo, K., & Laitinen, L. A. (1990). Prevalence of asthma in Finnish young men. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.301.6746.266
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.