The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Terminal cancer care and patients' preference for place of death: a prospective study.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE--To assess the preference of terminally ill patients with cancer for their place of final care. DESIGN--Prospective study of randomly selected patients with cancer from hospital and the community who were expected to die within a year. Patients expected to live less than two months were interviewed at two week intervals; otherwise patients were interviewed monthly. Their main carer was interviewed three months after the patient's death. SETTING--District general hospital, hospices, and patients' homes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Stated preferred place of final care; actual place of death; reason for final hospital admission for those in hospital; community care provision required for home care. RESULTS--Of 98 patients approached, 84 (86%) agreed to be interviewed, of whom 70 (83%) died during the study and 59 (84%) stated a preferred place of final care: 34 (58%) wished to die at home given existing circumstances, 12 (20%) in hospital, 12 (20%) in a hospice, and one (2%) elsewhere. Their own home was the preferred place of care for 17 (94%) of the patients who died there, whereas of the 32 patients who died in hospital 22 (69%) had stated a preference to die elsewhere. Had circumstances been more favourable 67% (41) of patients would have preferred to die at home, 16% (10) in hospital, and 15% (9) in hospice. CONCLUSION--With a limited increase in community care 50% more patients with cancer could be supported to die at home, as they and their carers would prefer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Grunfeld, E. (2004) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.1031205 · Cited by 963
Identifying Potential Indicators of the Quality of End-of-Life Cancer Care From Administrative Data
Earle, C. C., Park, E. R., Lai, B., Weeks, J. C., Ayanian, J. Z., & Block, S. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.03.059 · Cited by 894
Brumley, R., Enguidanos, S., Jamison, P., Seitz, R., Morgenstern, N., Saito, S., McIlwane, J., Hillary, K., & Gonzalez, J. (2007) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01234.x · Cited by 845
Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning
Heyland, D. K. (2013) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.180 · Cited by 496
A National Study of the Location of Death for Older Persons with Dementia
Mitchell, S. L., Teno, J. M., Miller, S. C., & Mor, V. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53118.x · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Townsend, J., Frank, A. O., Fermont, D., Dyer, S., Karran, O., Walgrove, A., & Piper, M.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1990-09-01
- Volume
- 301
- Issue
- 6749
- Pages
- 415-417
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2039945035
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Terminal cancer care and patients' preference for place of death: a prospective study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.301.6749.415
- The paper
- Townsend, J., Frank, A. O., Fermont, D., Dyer, S., Karran, O., Walgrove, A., & Piper, M. (1990). Terminal cancer care and patients' preference for place of death: a prospective study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.301.6749.415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.