Cited by 845Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CarePain Management and Opioid Use

Increased Satisfaction with Care and Lower Costs: Results of a Randomized Trial of In‐Home Palliative Care

Brumley, Richard, Enguidanos, Susan, Jamison, Paula, Seitz, Rae, Morgenstern, Nora, Saito, Sherry, McIlwane, Jan, Hillary, Kristine +1 more·2007·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether an in‐home palliative care intervention for terminally ill patients can improve patient satisfaction, reduce medical care costs, and increase the proportion of patients dying at home. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Two health maintenance organizations in two states. PARTICIPANTS: Homebound, terminally ill patients (N=298) with a prognosis of approximately 1 year or less to live plus one or more hospital or emergency department visits in the previous 12 months. INTERVENTION: Usual versus in‐home palliative care plus usual care delivered by an interdisciplinary team providing pain and symptom relief, patient and family education and training, and an array of medical and social support services. MEASUREMENTS: Measured outcomes were satisfaction with care, use of medical services, site of death, and costs of care. RESULTS: Patients randomized to in‐home palliative care reported greater improvement in satisfaction with care at 30 and 90 days after enrollment ( P <.05) and were more likely to die at home than those receiving usual care ( P <.001). In addition, in‐home palliative care subjects were less likely to visit the emergency department ( P =.01) or be admitted to the hospital than those receiving usual care ( P <.001), resulting in significantly lower costs of care for intervention patients ( P =.03). CONCLUSION: In‐home palliative care significantly increased patient satisfaction while reducing use of medical services and costs of medical care at the end of life. This study, although modest in scope, presents strong evidence for reforming end‐of‐life care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01234.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brumley, R., Enguidanos, S., Jamison, P., Seitz, R., Morgenstern, N., Saito, S., McIlwane, J., Hillary, K., & Gonzalez, J.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Partners in Care Foundation (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06-18
Volume
55
Issue
7
Pages
993-1000
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2108517568
Cited by
845
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 41
FWCI
19.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
end-of-life care, patient satisfaction, health care costs, home death, dying patients, homebound patients, emergency department visits, hospitalization, interdisciplinary care teams, symptom management, health maintenance organizations
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Health Maintenance Organizations, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Palliative Care, Patient Education as Topic, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Health Care Costs, Patient Satisfaction, Terminally Ill

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review