Cited by 496Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics and bioethics in healthcarePalliative and Oncologic Care

Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning

Heyland, Daren K.·2013·JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Advance care planning can improve patient-centered care and potentially reduce intensification of care at the end of life. OBJECTIVES: To inquire about patients' advance care planning activities before hospitalization and preferences for care from the perspectives of patients and family members, as well as to measure real-time concordance between expressed preferences for care and documentation of those preferences in the medical record. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Twelve acute care hospitals in Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Elderly patients who were at high risk of dying in the next 6 months and their family members. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses to an in-person administered questionnaire and concordance of expressed preferences and orders of care documented in the medical record. RESULTS: Of 513 patients and 366 family members approached, 278 patients (54.2%) and 225 family members (61.5%) consented to participate. The mean ages of patients and family members were 80.0 and 60.8 years, respectively. Before hospitalization, most patients (76.3%) had thought about end-of-life (EOL) care, and only 11.9% preferred life-prolonging care; 47.9% of patients had completed an advance care plan, and 73.3% had formally named a surrogate decision maker for health care. Of patients who had discussed their wishes, only 30.3% had done so with the family physician and 55.3% with any member of the health care team. Agreement between patients' expressed preferences for EOL care and documentation in the medical record was 30.2%. Family members' perspectives were similar to those of patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Many elderly patients at high risk of dying and their family members have expressed preferences for medical treatments at the EOL. However, communication with health care professionals and documentation of these preferences remains inadequate. Efforts to reduce this significant medical error of omission are warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.180

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heyland, D. K.
Affiliations
Kingston General Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Heyland, Daren K.
Venue
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2013-05-13
Volume
173
Issue
9
Pages
778
ISSN
2168-6106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117711248
Cited by
496
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 20
FWCI
42.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
advance care planning, elderly patients, hospitalized older adults, end-of-life care, family involvement, surrogate decision-making, advance directives, clinical documentation, patient preferences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Canada, Family, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Terminal Care, Advance Directives, Patient-Centered Care, Advance Care Planning, Patient Preference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review