The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Role of peak bone mass and bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 12 year study.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of peak bone mass and subsequent postmenopausal bone loss in the development of osteoporosis and the reliability of identifying women at risk from one bone mass measurement and one biochemical assessment of the future bone loss. DESIGN: Population based study. SETTING: Outpatient clinic for research into osteoporosis. SUBJECTS: 178 healthy early postmenopausal women who had participated in a two year study in 1977. 154 of the women underwent follow up examination in 1989, of whom 33 were excluded because of diseases or taking drugs known to affect calcium metabolism. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bone mineral content of the forearm and values of biochemical markers of bone turnover. RESULTS: The average reduction in bone mineral content during 1977-89 was 20%, but the fast losers had lost 10.0% more than had the slow loser group (mean loss 26.6% in fast losers and 16.6% in slow losers; p less than 0.001). Prediction of future bone mineral content using baseline bone mineral content and estimated rate of loss gave results almost identical with the actual bone mineral content measured in 1989. Seven women had had a Colles' fracture and 20 a spinal compression fracture. The group with Colles' fracture had low baseline bone mineral content (34.7 (95% confidence interval 31.3 to 38.1) units v 39.4 (38.1 to 40.8) units in women with no fracture) whereas the group with spinal fracture had a normal baseline bone mineral content (38.1 (35.0 to 41.1) units) but an increased rate of loss (-2.4 (-3.5 to -1.3)%/year v -1.8 (-2.1 to -1.5)%/year in women with no fracture). CONCLUSIONS: One baseline measurement of bone mass combined with a single estimation of the rate of bone loss can reliably identify the women at menopause who are at highest risk of developing osteoporosis later in life. The rate of loss may have an independent role in likelihood of vertebral fracture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sex Steroids and the Construction and Conservation of the Adult Skeleton
Riggs, B. L., Khosla, S., & Melton, L. J. (2002) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.23.3.0465 · Cited by 1,846
Greendale, G. A., Lee, N. P., & Arriola, E. R. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)05352-5 · Cited by 467
Fink, H. A., Ewing, S. K., Ensrud, K. E., Barrett-Connor, E., Taylor, B. C., Cauley, J. A., & Orwoll, E. S. (2006) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2006-0173 · Cited by 319
The Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada 2018: Extra-intestinal Diseases in IBD
Bernstein, C. N., Benchimol, E. I., Bitton, A., Murthy, S. K., Nguyen, G. C., Lee, K., Cooke-Lauder, J., & Kaplan, G. G. (2019) · Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy053 · Cited by 81
Anastasilakis, A. D., Tsourdi, E., Makras, P., Polyzos, S. A., Meier, C., McCloskey, E. V., Pepe, J., & Zillikens, M. C. (2019) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2019.07.006 · Cited by 71
Dorn, L. D., Pabst, S., Sontag, L. M., Kalkwarf, H. J., Hillman, J. B., & Susman, E. J. (2011) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.03.008 · Cited by 24
Saito, S., Koga, E., Okada, Y., Tsuburai, T., Yoshikata, H., Miyagi, E., & Sakakibara, H. (2021) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-020-05652-1 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansen, M. A., Overgaard, K., Riis, B. J., & Christiansen, C.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1991-10-19
- Volume
- 303
- Issue
- 6808
- Pages
- 961-964
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2034196869
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.