The DOI matches its Crossref record; 122 of the 122 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Objective : To assess treatment discontinuation rates with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants. Design : Meta-analysis of 62 randomised controlled trials. Subjects : 6029 patients with major unipolar depression. Main outcome measures : Pooled risk ratios for drop out rates with respect to all cases of discontinuation and those due to side effects and treatment failure. Results : The total discontinuation rate was 10% lower with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors than with tricyclic antidepressants (risk ratio 0.90; 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.97) and the drop out rate due to side effects was 25% lower (risk ratio 0.75; 0.66 to 0.84). There was no significant difference between drug classes in the drop out rates for treatment failure. The risk ratios for drop out did not differ significantly between individual selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Conclusions : Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are better tolerated than tricyclic antidepressants as measured by total numbers of drop outs. The definite advantage to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors is explained by fewer drop outs due to side effects. The overall difference, however, is comparatively small and may not be clinically relevant. Analyses of cost effectiveness should not overestimate the advantage to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Key messages: Key messages In a meta-analysis of randomised, short term clinical trials selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were associated with 10% fewer overall drop outs than tricyclic antidepressants (nine drop outs for every 10 with tricyclic agents) This difference was accounted for by a lower rate of drop out related to side effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (25% reduction; three drop outs for every four with tricyclic agents) This comparatively small difference in drop out rate is of uncertain importance clinically and when cost effectiveness is considered Further studies of the tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with that of tricyclic antidepressants are required over a longer period in the setting of clinical practice rather than clinical trials
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
Walter, S. D., & Altman, D. G. (1992) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532320 · Cited by 11,668
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
Kupper, L. L., Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290035 · Cited by 7,599
Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
Bartko, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (1992) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290246 · Cited by 4,797
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Lachenbruch, P. A. (1972) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1972.10488903 · Cited by 1,703
Recognition and management of depression in general practice: consensus statement
Paykel, E. S., & Priest, R. G. (1992) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.305.6863.1198 · Cited by 540
Diet, Body Size, and Breast Cancer
Hunter, D. J., & Willett, W. C. (1993) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036096 · Cited by 489
Cigarette Smoking and Urinary Estrogens
MacMahon, B., Trichopoulos, D., Cole, P., & Brown, J. (1982) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198210213071707 · Cited by 404
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: meta-analysis of efficacy and acceptability.
Song, F., Freemantle, N., Sheldon, T. A., House, A., Watson, P., Long, A., & Mason, J. (1993) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.306.6879.683 · Cited by 399
Cited by
The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics
(2006) · The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics · doi:10.1002/(issn)1099-176x · Cited by 1,243
Anderson, I. M. (2000) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00092-0 · Cited by 940
Self-citationMT1 and MT2 Melatonin Receptors: A Therapeutic Perspective
Liu, J., Clough, S. J., Hutchinson, A. J., Adamah-Biassi, E. B., Popovska-Gorevski, M., & Dubocovich, M. L. (2016) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010814-124742 · Cited by 630
van der Flier, W. M., Skoog, I., Schneider, J. A., Pantoni, L., Mok, V., Chen, C. L. H., & Scheltens, P. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2018.3 · Cited by 594
The Antidepressive Effects of Exercise: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
Rethorst, C. D., Wipfli, B. M., & Landers, D. M. (2009) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200939060-00004 · Cited by 541
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, I. M., & Tomenson, B. M.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1995-06-03
- Volume
- 310
- Issue
- 6992
- Pages
- 1433-1438
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2048361493
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 122
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.310.6992.1433
- The paper
- Anderson, I. M., & Tomenson, B. M. (1995). Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6992.1433
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.