Cited by 540Mental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Recognition and management of depression in general practice: consensus statement

Open access
Paykel, E. S., Priest, R. G.·1992·BMJ

Abstract

E S Paykel, R G Priest, on behalf of conference participantsDepression is a frequently occurring psychiatric dis- order, and most depressed patients in the United Kingdom are treated in general practice.The Royal College of Psychiatrists, in association with the Royal College of General Practitioners, has embarked on a "defeat depression" campaign.'Anticipating that an increased proportion of the large numbers of the general population who do not at present receive treatment for depressive illness will present to helping agencies, the two colleges are preparing professional educational materials and guidelines.In recent years there has been a great deal of new knowledge regarding diagnosis, recognition, and effects of treatment.Two consensus meetings in which participants were mainly representatives of the two colleges, together with other experts, were therefore held in 1991 to consider, firstly, diagnosis and recog- nition (21 October 1991) and, secondly, management (15 November 199 1).Specific questions were addressed by a presenter with a prepared paper, and a discussant, followed by extensive general discussion to reach an agreed consensus, which was circulated to participants for further approval.We present views that reflect the agreed conclusions.We emphasise, however, that they do not necessarily reflect the official policy of either of the two colleges.They are intended to form guidelines which we hope will be useful in practice and also in audit. Diagnosis and recognition of depression

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.305.6863.1198

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagniostic atnd statistical mzanual of nental disorders, third edition, revised. Washington, DC: APA, 1987.
  2. Paykel ES. The background: extent and nature of the disorder. In: Herbst K, Paykel ES, eds. Depressiotn: an ilntegrative approach. Oxford: Heinemanrn, 1989:3-17.
  3. Tylee AT, Freeling P. The recognition, diagnosis and acknowledgment of depressive disorder by GPs. In: Herbst K, Paykel ES, eds. Depression: an integratiVe approach. Oxford: Heinemann, 1989:216-31.
  4. Edwards JG. Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors: a modest though welcome advance in the treatment of depression. BMJ 1992;304:1644-6.
  5. Paykel ES, DiMascio A, Klerman G, Prusoff BA, Weissman MM. Main- tenance therapy of depression. Pharmacopsychiatry 1976;9:127-36.
  6. Hawton K, Salkowskis P, Clark D. CognititVe behaviour therapy for psychiatric problemns. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
  7. Blackbum IM, Davidson K. Cognitive therapy for depression and anzxiety. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paykel, E. S., & Priest, R. G.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1992-11-14
Volume
305
Issue
6863
Pages
1198-1202
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1970278663
Cited by
540
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
FWCI
45.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depression, general practice, primary care, depression diagnosis, depression treatment, clinical guidelines, Royal College of General Practitioners, Royal College of Psychiatrists
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Clinical Competence, Depression, Family Practice, Humans, Psychotherapy, Referral and Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review