Cited by 344Virology and Viral DiseasesImmune responses and vaccinationsVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Non-specific beneficial effect of measles immunisation: analysis of mortality studies from developing countries

Open access
Aaby, Peter, Samb, Badara, Simondon, Francois, Seck, Awa Marie Coll, Knudsen, Kim, Whittle, Hilton·1995·BMJ

Abstract

Objective : To examine whether the reduction in mortality after standard titre measles immunisation in developing countries can be explained simply by the prevention of acute measles and its long term consequences. Design : An analysis of all studies comparing mortality of unimmunised children and children immunised with standard titre measles vaccine in developing countries. Studies : 10 cohort and two case-control studies from Bangladesh, Benin, Burundi, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Senegal, and Zaire. Main outcome measures : Protective efficacy of standard titre measles immunisation against all cause mortality. Extent to which difference in mortality between immunised and unimmunised children could be explained by prevention of measles disease. Results : Protective efficacy against death after measles immunisation ranged from 30% to 86%. Efficacy was highest in the studies with short follow up and when children were immunised in infancy (range 44-100%). Vaccine efficacy against death was much greater than the proportion of deaths attributed to acute measles disease. In four studies from Guinea-Bissau, Senegal, and Burundi vaccine efficacy against death remained almost unchanged when cases of measles were excluded from the analysis. Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis and polio vaccinations were not associated with reduction in mortality. Conclusion : These observations suggest that standard titre measles vaccine may confer a beneficial effect which is unrelated to the specific protection against measles disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.311.7003.481

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aaby, P., Samb, B., Simondon, F., Seck, A. M. C., Knudsen, K., & Whittle, H.
Affiliations
  • Statens Serum Institut (DK)
  • Cheikh Anta Diop University (SN)
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1995-08-19
Volume
311
Issue
7003
Pages
481-485
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2014480218
Cited by
344
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
measles vaccine, non-specific vaccine effects, child mortality, vaccine efficacy, measles mortality, developing countries, infant immunization, DTP vaccine, polio vaccine
MeSH terms
Bangladesh, Benin, Burundi, Child, Preschool, Developing Countries, Diphtheria Toxoid, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Humans, Immunization, Infant, Measles, Measles Vaccine, Mortality, Pertussis Vaccine, Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated, Senegal, Tetanus Toxoid, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Cohort Studies, Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine, Case-Control Studies, Vaccines, Combined

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review