The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Qualitative Research in Health Care
Abstract
Ed Nicholas Mays, Catherine Pope BMJ Publishing Group, pounds sterling10.95, pp 79 ISBN 0 7279 1013 2 Why does evidence from meticulous trials have so little impact on clinical practice? How do the ways in which clinical teams coordinate their work affect patients' outcomes? Why do many people accept advice on “healthy living” but not put it into practice? These and many similar questions relate to the perplexing gaps between research evidence and its effective use, between health services and outcomes, and between personal knowledge …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments
Perneger, T. V. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236 · Cited by 5,900
Presenting and evaluating qualitative research
Anderson, C. (2010) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/aj7408141 · Cited by 1,188
Focus group interviews as a data collecting strategy
McLafferty, I. (2004) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03186.x · Cited by 798
Morgan, M., Gibbs, S., Maxwell, K., & Britten, N. (2002) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794102002001636 · Cited by 420
Accounting for EBM: Notions of evidence in medicine
Lambert, H. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.023 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Alderson, P.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1996-02-24
- Volume
- 312
- Issue
- 7029
- Pages
- 519.2
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1968410018
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 58.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Qualitative Research in Health Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.312.7029.519a
- The paper
- Alderson, P. (1996). Qualitative Research in Health Care. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7029.519a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
