The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bone density and risk of hip fracture in men and women: cross sectional analysis
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To determine the relative contribution of decline in bone density to the increase in risk of hip fracture with age in men and women. Design: Incidence data of hip fracture from the general population were combined with the bone density distribution in a sample from the same population and with a risk estimate of low bone density known from literature. Setting: The Netherlands. Subjects: All people with a hospital admission for a hip fracture in 1993, and bone density measured in a sample of 5814 men and women aged 55 years and over in a district of Rotterdam. Main outcome measure: One year cumulative risk of hip fracture by age, sex, and bone density measured at the femoral neck. Results: A quarter of all hip fractures occurred in men. Men reached the same incidence as women at five years older. Controlled for age, the risk of hip fracture by bone density was similar in men and women. The risk of hip fracture increased 13-fold from age 60 to 80; decrease in bone density associated with age contributed 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.5 to 2.4) in women and 1.6 (1.3 to 1.8) in men. Conclusions: The risk of hip fracture by age and bone density is similar in men and women. The decrease in bone density associated with age makes a limited contribution to the exponential increase of the risk of hip fracture with age. Key messages: The risk of hip fracture increases exponentially with age in both men and women Men have about the same risk of hip fracture five years later than women The risk of hip fracture by age and bone density is similar in men and women The difference in age specific incidence is explained completely by the different bone density in men and women The contribution of decline in bone density to the exponential increase in risk of hip fracture with age is relatively small
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk Factors for Hip Fracture in White Women
Cummings, S. R., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W. S., Stone, K., Fox, K. M., Ensrud, K. E., Cauley, J., Black, D., & Vogt, T. M. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199503233321202 · Cited by 3,595
Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures
Cummings, S. R., Browner, W., Cummings, S. R., Black, D. M., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W., Genant, H. K., Cauley, J., Ensrud, K., Scott, J., et al. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92555-8 · Cited by 2,446
Cited by
FRAX™ and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK
Kanis, J. A., Johnell, O., Oden, A., Johansson, H., & McCloskey, E. (2008) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-007-0543-5 · Cited by 2,467
Schuit, S. C. E., van der Klift, M., Weel, A. E. A. M., de Laet, C. E. D. H., Burger, H., Seeman, E., Hofman, A., Uitterlinden, A. G., van Leeuwen, J. P. T. M., & Pols, H. A. P. (2004) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2003.10.001 · Cited by 1,651
Self-citationTheobald, H. E. (2005) · Nutrition Bulletin · doi:10.1111/j.1467-3010.2005.00514.x · Cited by 203
Determinants of bone density in healthy older men with low testosterone levels
Kenny, A. M., Prestwood, K. M., Marcello, K. M., & Raisz, L. G. (2000) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/55.9.m492 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- De Laet, C. E. D. H., van Hout, B. A., Burger, H., Hofman, A., & Pols, H. A. P.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1997-07-26
- Volume
- 315
- Issue
- 7102
- Pages
- 221-225
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2080442644
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.