Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bone density and risk of hip fracture in men and women: cross sectional analysis

Open access
De Laet, Chris E D H, van Hout, Ben A, Burger, Huibert, Hofman, Albert, Pols, Huibert A P·1997·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To determine the relative contribution of decline in bone density to the increase in risk of hip fracture with age in men and women. Design: Incidence data of hip fracture from the general population were combined with the bone density distribution in a sample from the same population and with a risk estimate of low bone density known from literature. Setting: The Netherlands. Subjects: All people with a hospital admission for a hip fracture in 1993, and bone density measured in a sample of 5814 men and women aged 55 years and over in a district of Rotterdam. Main outcome measure: One year cumulative risk of hip fracture by age, sex, and bone density measured at the femoral neck. Results: A quarter of all hip fractures occurred in men. Men reached the same incidence as women at five years older. Controlled for age, the risk of hip fracture by bone density was similar in men and women. The risk of hip fracture increased 13-fold from age 60 to 80; decrease in bone density associated with age contributed 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.5 to 2.4) in women and 1.6 (1.3 to 1.8) in men. Conclusions: The risk of hip fracture by age and bone density is similar in men and women. The decrease in bone density associated with age makes a limited contribution to the exponential increase of the risk of hip fracture with age. Key messages: The risk of hip fracture increases exponentially with age in both men and women Men have about the same risk of hip fracture five years later than women The risk of hip fracture by age and bone density is similar in men and women The difference in age specific incidence is explained completely by the different bone density in men and women The contribution of decline in bone density to the exponential increase in risk of hip fracture with age is relatively small

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.315.7102.221

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
De Laet, C. E. D. H., van Hout, B. A., Burger, H., Hofman, A., & Pols, H. A. P.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1997-07-26
Volume
315
Issue
7102
Pages
221-225
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2080442644
Cited by
349
References
2
FWCI
16.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.