Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 460

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomised trial of impact of model of integrated care and case management for older people living in the community

Open access
Bernabei, Roberto, Landi, Francesco, Gambassi, Giovanni, Sgadari, Antonio, Zuccala, Giuseppe, Mor, Vincent, Rubenstein, Laurence Z, Carbonin, PierUgo·1998·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a programme of integrated social and medical care among frail elderly people living in the community. Design: Randomised study with 1 year follow up. Setting: Town in northern Italy (Rovereto). Subjects: 200 older people already receiving conventional community care services. Intervention: Random allocation to an intervention group receiving integrated social and medical care and case management or to a control group receiving conventional care. Main outcome measures: Admission to an institution, use and costs of health services, variations in functional status. Results: Survival analysis showed that admission to hospital or nursing home in the intervention group occurred later and was less common than in controls (hazard ratio 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.53 to 0.91). Health services were used to the same extent, but control subjects received more frequent home visits by general practitioners. In the intervention group the estimated financial savings were in the order of £1125 ($1800) per year of follow up. The intervention group had improved physical function (activities of daily living score improved by 5.1% v 13.0% loss in controls; P<0.001). Decline of cognitive status (measured by the short portable mental status questionnaire) was also reduced (3.8% v 9.4%; P<0.05). Conclusion: Integrated social and medical care with case management programmes may provide a cost effective approach to reduce admission to institutions and functional decline in older people living in the community. Key messages: Responsibility for management of care of elderly people living in the community is poorly defined Integration of medical and social services together with care management programmes would improve such care in the community In a comparison of this option with a traditional and fragmented model of community care the integrated care approach reduced admission to institutions and functional decline in frail elderly people living in the community and also reduced costs

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.316.7141.1348

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 460

Metadata

Authors
Bernabei, R., Landi, F., Gambassi, G., Sgadari, A., Zuccala, G., Mor, V., Rubenstein, L. Z., & Carbonin, P.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1998-05-02
Volume
316
Issue
7141
Pages
1348
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2009179762
Cited by
460
References
2
FWCI
40.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomised trial of impact of model of integrated care and case management for older people living in the community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.316.7141.1348
The paper
Bernabei, R., Landi, F., Gambassi, G., Sgadari, A., Zuccala, G., Mor, V., Rubenstein, L. Z., & Carbonin, P. (1998). Randomised trial of impact of model of integrated care and case management for older people living in the community. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7141.1348

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.