The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Population based cohort study of the association between alcohol intake and cancer of the upper digestive tract
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To examine the relation between different types of alcoholic drinks and upper digestive tract cancers (oropharyngeal and oesophageal). Design: Population based study with baseline assessment of intake of beer, wine, and spirits, smoking habits, educational level, and 2-19 years' follow up on risk of upper digestive tract cancer. Setting: Denmark. Subjects: 15 117 men and 13 063 women aged 20 to 98 years. Main outcome measure: Number and time of identification of incident upper digestive tract cancer during follow up. Results: During a mean follow up of 13.5 years, 156 subjects developed upper digestive tract cancer. Compared with non-drinkers (drinkers of <1 drink/week), subjects who drank 7-21 beers or spirits a week but no wine were at a risk of 3.0 (95% confidence interval 1.5 to 6.1), whereas those who had the same total alcohol intake but with wine as 30% of their intake had a risk of 0.5 (0.2 to 1.4). Drinkers of >21 beers and spirits but no wine had a relative risk of 5.2 (2.7 to 10.2) compared with non-drinkers, whereas those who drank the same amount, but included wine in their alcohol intake, had a relative risk of 1.7 (0.6 to 4.4). Conclusion: A moderate intake of wine probably does not increase the risk of upper digestive tract cancer, whereas a moderate intake of beer or spirits increases the risk considerably.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer chemopreventive activity of resveratrol, a natural product derived from grapes
Jang, M., Cai, L., Udeani, G. O., Slowing, K. V., Thomas, C. F., Beecher, C. W. W., Fong, H. H. S., Farnsworth, N. R., Kinghorn, A. D., Mehta, R. G., et al. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5297.218 · Cited by 4,935
Cited by
Dietary polyphenols and the prevention of diseases
Scalbert, A., Manach, C., Morand, C., Rémésy, C., & Jiménez, L. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/1040869059096 · Cited by 2,999
Santos-Buelga, C., & Scalbert, A. (2000) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0010(20000515)80:7<1094::aid-jsfa569>3.0.co;2-1 · Cited by 1,258
Polyphenols, oral health and disease: A review
Petti, S., & Scully, C. (2009) · Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2009.02.003 · Cited by 411
Deprez, S., Mila, I., Huneau, J.-F., Tome, D., & Scalbert, A. (2001) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/152308601317203503 · Cited by 379
Castellsagu�, X., Mu�oz, N., De Stefani, E., Victora, C. G., Castelletto, R., Rol�n, P. A., & Quintana, M. J. (1999) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990827)82:5<657::aid-ijc7>3.0.co;2-c · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Grønbæk, M., Becker, U., Johansen, D., Tønnesen, H., Jensen, G., & Sørensen, T. I. A.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1998-09-26
- Volume
- 317
- Issue
- 7162
- Pages
- 844.1-848
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2047535989
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Population based cohort study of the association between alcohol intake and cancer of the upper digestive tract. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.317.7162.844
- The paper
- Grønbæk, M., Becker, U., Johansen, D., Tønnesen, H., Jensen, G., & Sørensen, T. I. A. (1998). Population based cohort study of the association between alcohol intake and cancer of the upper digestive tract. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7162.844
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.