Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 305

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in functional dyspepsia: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial with 12 months' follow up

Open access
Talley, N. J, Janssens, J., Lauritsen, K., Racz, I., Bolling-Sternevald, E.·1999·BMJ

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: To determine whether eradication of Helicobacter pylori relieves the symptoms of functional dyspepsia. Design: Multicentre randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. Subjects: 278 patients infected with H pylori who had functional dyspepsia. Setting: Predominantly secondary care centres in Australia, New Zealand, and Europe. Intervention: Patients randomised to receive omeprazole 20 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily, and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily or placebo for 7 days. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Main outcome measures: Symptom status (assessed by diary cards) and presence of H pylori (assessed by gastric biopsies and 13C-urea breath testing using urea labelled with carbon-13). Results:H pylori was eradicated in 113 patients (85%) in the treatment group and 6 patients (4%) in the placebo group. At 12 months follow up there was no significant difference between the proportion of patients treated successfully by intention to treat in the eradication arm (24%, 95% confidence interval 17% to 32%) and the proportion of patients treated successfully by intention to treat in the placebo group (22%, 15% to 30%). Changes in symptom scores and quality of life did not significantly differ between the treatment and placebo groups. When the groups were combined, there was a significant association between treatment success and chronic gastritis score at 12 months; 41/127 (32%) patients with no or mild gastritis were successfully treated compared with 21/123 (17%) patients with persistent gastritis (P=0.008). Conclusion: No convincing evidence was found that eradication of H pylori relieves the symptoms of functional dyspepsia 12 months after treatment. Key messages Dyspepsia (pain or discomfort centred in the upper abdomen) is frequently unexplained; such patients are classed as having functional (or non-ulcer) dyspepsia H pylori gastritis is common in patients with functional dyspepsia but the benefits of treatment are controversial No significant benefit in relief of symptoms was found between patients successfully treated for H pylori infection and those with persistent infection Eradication of H pylori does not relieve the symptoms of functional dyspepsia

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.318.7187.833

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 305

Metadata

Authors
Talley, N. J., Janssens, J., Lauritsen, K., Racz, I., & Bolling-Sternevald, E.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1999-03-27
Volume
318
Issue
7187
Pages
833-837
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2061519578
Cited by
305
References
19
FWCI
45.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in functional dyspepsia: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial with 12 months' follow up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.318.7187.833
The paper
Talley, N. J., Janssens, J., Lauritsen, K., Racz, I., & Bolling-Sternevald, E. (1999). Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in functional dyspepsia: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial with 12 months' follow up. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7187.833

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.