The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learner centred approaches in medical education
Open accessAbstract
Medical education is a lifelong process embracing premedical experience, undergraduate education, general clinical training, specialist or vocational training, subspecialty training, and continuing medical education. Although medical education was once seen as the province of medical schools and teaching hospitals, large and increasing numbers of practitioners now provide teaching and promotion of learning outside the traditional environment. Over the past decade both the university sector and the NHS have seen considerable change and increased accountability for their activities, and all the signs suggest that the next 10 years will be no different. Simultaneously, medical schools are having to acknowledge the implementation of new curricula, the consequences of new health service priorities, an increase in the number of medical students, and the implications of the report from the National Committee of Enquiry into Higher Education, chaired by Sir Ron Dearing.1 The most recent recommendations of the General Medical Council's education committee were intended to promote an approach to undergraduate medical education and to give a perspective on its aims, which differ substantially from those of traditional curricula.2 Although the 13 principal recommendations are now well known, at the core is the promotion of the merits of learner centred and problem oriented approaches to learning, which aim to produce doctors better equipped with the adult learning skills necessary for them to adapt to, and meet, the changing needs of the community they serve. The pedagogic shift from the traditional teacher centred approach, in which the emphasis is on teachers and what they teach, to a student centred approach, in which the emphasis is on students and what they learn, requires a fundamental change in the role of the educator from that of a didactic teacher to that of a facilitator of learning.3 Our aim was to explore some of the …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Educational strategies in curriculum development: the SPICES model
HARDEN, R. M., SOWDEN, S., & DUNN, W. R. (1984) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1984.tb01024.x · Cited by 772
What clinical teachers in medicine need to know.
Irby, D. M. (1994) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199405000-00003 · Cited by 434
Problem-based learning: have the expectations been met?
Berkson, L. (1993) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199310000-00053 · Cited by 430
Maudsley, G. (1999) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199902000-00016 · Cited by 367
Cited by
Self‐directed learning in nurse education: a review of the literature
O'Shea, E. (2003) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02673.x · Cited by 342
Lin, H.-C., & Hwang, G.-J. (2019) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1467462 · Cited by 159
Bull, N. B., Silverman, C. D., & Bonrath, E. M. (2020) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2019.08.002 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Spencer, J. A., & Jordan, R. K.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1999-05-08
- Volume
- 318
- Issue
- 7193
- Pages
- 1280-1283
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1981930409
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learner centred approaches in medical education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1280
- The paper
- Spencer, J. A., & Jordan, R. K. (1999). Learner centred approaches in medical education. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1280
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.