Cited by 439Innovations in Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsEvaluation of Teaching Practices

What clinical teachers in medicine need to know.

Irby, D M·1994·Academic Medicine

Abstract

In order to identify the components of knowledge that effective clinical teachers of medicine need, the author carried out a qualitative study of six distinguished clinical teachers in general internal medicine in 1991. Using data from interviews, a structured task, and observations of each ward team, he identified six domains of knowledge essential to teaching excellence in the context of teaching rounds: clinical knowledge of medicine, patients, and the context of practice, as well as educational knowledge of learners, general principles of teaching and case-based teaching scripts. When combined, these domains of knowledge allow attending physicians to engage in clinical instructional reasoning and to target their teaching to the specific needs of their learners. The results of this investigation are discussed in relation to both prior research on teacher knowledge, reasoning, and action and faculty development in medicine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001888-199405000-00003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Irby, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Irby, D M
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
1994-05
Volume
69
Issue
5
Pages
333-42
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094892399
Cited by
434
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 19
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
clinical teaching, teacher knowledge, attending physicians, general internal medicine, teaching rounds, case-based teaching, faculty development, medical education, student needs
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Faculty, Medical, Humans, Internal Medicine, Teaching, Models, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review