Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extracts from "Clinical Evidence": Endometriosis

Open access
Farquhar, C. M·2000·BMJ

Abstract

Background Definition: Endometriosis is characterised by ectopic endometrial tissue, which can cause dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, non-cyclical pelvic pain, and subfertility. Diagnosis is made by laparoscopy. Most endometrial deposits are found in the pelvis (ovaries, peritoneum, uterosacral ligaments, pouch of Douglas, and rectovaginal septum). Extrapelvic deposits, including those in the umbilicus and diaphragm, are rare. Endometriomas are cysts of endometriosis within the ovary. Interventions In women with pain attributed to endometriosis Beneficial: Hormonal treatments (danazol, medroxyprogesterone, gestrinone, gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues) Combined ablation of endometrial deposits and uterine nerve Postoperative hormonal treatment Cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma (better than drainage) Likely to be beneficial: Oral contraceptive pill Unknown effectiveness: Dydrogesterone Laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation (LUNA) Laparoscopic ablation of endometrial deposits Preoperative hormonal treatment In women with subfertility attributed to endometriosis Beneficial: Laparoscopic ablation or excision of endometrial deposits Cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma (better than drainage) Unlikely to be beneficial: Hormonal treatment Postoperative hormonal treatment Incidence/prevalence: In asymptomatic women, the prevalence ranges from 2% to 22%, depending on the diagnostic criteria used and the populations studied.1–4 In women with dysmenorrhoea, the incidence of endometriosis ranges from 40% to 60%, and in women with subfertility it ranges from 20% to 30%.256 The severity of symptoms and the probability of diagnosis increase with age.7 Incidence peaks at about age 40.8 Symptoms and laparoscopic appearance do not always correlate.9 Aetiology: The cause is unknown. Risk factors include early menarche and late menopause. Embryonic cells may give rise to deposits in the umbilicus, while retrograde menstruation may deposit endometrial cells in the diaphragm.1011 Oral contraceptives reduce the risk of endometriosis, and this protective effect persists for up to a year after their discontinuation.9 Prognosis: We found one small randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which repeat laparoscopy was performed in the women treated with placebo. Over 12 months, endometrial deposits resolved spontaneously in a quarter, deteriorated in nearly half, and were unchanged in the remainder.12 Aims: To relieve pain (dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, and other pelvic pain) and to improve fertility, with minimal adverse effects. Outcomes: American Fertility Society scores for size and number of deposits; recurrence rates; time between stopping treatment and recurrence; rate of adverse effects of treatment. In women with pain: relief of pain, assessed by visual analogue scale and subjective improvement. In women with subfertility: cumulative pregnancy rate, live birth rate. In women undergoing surgery: ease of surgical intervention (rated as easy, average, difficult, or very difficult).13

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.320.7247.1449

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Farquhar, C. M.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2000-05-27
Volume
320
Issue
7247
Pages
1449-1452
ISSN
0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967193500
Cited by
172
References
5
FWCI
5.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extracts from "Clinical Evidence": Endometriosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.320.7247.1449
The paper
Farquhar, C. M. (2000). Extracts from "Clinical Evidence": Endometriosis. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7247.1449

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.