Cited by 269Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: a pragmatic approach

Vercellini, P., Somigliana, E., Vigano, P., Abbiati, A., Barbara, G., Crosignani, P. G.·2009·Human Reproduction

Abstract

Laparoscopic treatment for endometriosis-associated infertility is gaining widespread popularity supported mostly by uncontrolled studies, but the purported benefit of surgery may be overvalued. We have therefore analysed the best available evidence with the aim of defining an approximate estimate of the effect size of conservative surgery for infertile women with endometriosis in various clinical conditions. The overall increase in post-operative likelihood of conception over background pregnancy rate may be estimated to be between 10 and 25%. The effect of surgery for peritoneal lesions is limited, and an estimate of benefit should be decreased by the fact that preoperative identification of the subjects actually with the condition is unfeasible. The benefit of excision of ovarian endometriomas is difficult to define due to multiple confounding factors and methodological drawbacks in the considered studies. Excision of rectovaginal endometriosis is of doubtful value and associated with worrying morbidity. The role of surgery before, after or as an alternative to IVF needs clarification. In conclusion, the absolute benefit increase of surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility appears smaller than previously believed. Complete and detailed information on risks and benefits of treatment alternatives must be offered to infertile patients to allow unbiased choices between possible options.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/den379

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vercellini, P., Somigliana, E., Vigano, P., Abbiati, A., Barbara, G., & Crosignani, P. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2009-02-01
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
254-269
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2129744763
Cited by
269
References
142
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
19.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis-associated infertility, laparoscopic surgery, conservative surgery, endometrioma, rectovaginal endometriosis, peritoneal endometriosis, in vitro fertilization, surgical risks and benefits, evidence synthesis
MeSH terms
Endometriosis, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Infertility, Female, Laparoscopy, Pregnancy, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Pregnancy Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review