The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multicentre controlled trial of parenting groups for childhood antisocial behaviour in clinical practiceCommentary: nipping conduct problems in the bud
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To see whether a behaviourally based group parenting programme, delivered in regular clinical practice, is an effective treatment for antisocial behaviour in children. Design: Controlled trial with permuted block design with allocation by date of referral. Setting: Four local child and adolescent mental health services. Participants: 141 children aged 3-8 years referred with antisocial behaviour and allocated to parenting groups (90) or waiting list control (51). Intervention: Webster-Stratton basic videotape programme administered to parents of six to eight children over 13-16 weeks. This programme emphasises engagement with parental emotions, rehearsal of behavioural strategies, and parental understanding of its scientific rationale. Main outcome measures: Semistructured parent interview and questionnaires about antisocial behaviour in children administered 5-7 months after entering trial; direct observation of parent-child interaction. Results: Referred children were highly antisocial (above the 97th centile on interview measure). Children in the intervention group showed a large reduction in antisocial behaviour; those in the waiting list group did not change (effect size between groups 1.06 SD (95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.41), P<0.001). Parents in the intervention group increased the proportion of praise to ineffective commands they gave their children threefold, while control parents reduced it by a third (effect size between groups 0.76 (0.16 to 1.36), P=0.018). If the 31 children lost to follow up were included in an intention to treat analysis the effect size on antisocial behaviour was reduced by 16%. Conclusions: Parenting groups effectively reduce serious antisocial behaviour in children in real life conditions. Follow up is needed to see if the children's poor prognosis is improved and criminality prevented. What is already known on this topic: Children who persistently display a high level of antisocial behaviour are at high risk of social rejection, juvenile delinquency, and long term unemployment; the cost to society is high While some behaviourally based parenting programmes have been shown to be effective in university centre trials with volunteers or specially selected cases, most trials of psychological treatments for children in real life settings have shown no effect What this study adds: An evidence based intervention is available for use in regular clinical practice that effectively reduces antisocial behaviour in referred children The intervention works well with children at risk of criminality from a combination of highly antisocial behaviour, multiple psychopathology, and social deprivation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note
Goodman, R. (1997) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x · Cited by 14,908
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy
Moffitt, T. E. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.4.674 · Cited by 9,987
Defining empirically supported therapies.
Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.66.1.7 · Cited by 3,067
(1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,951
The Development and Treatment of Childhood Aggression
(2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203771693 · Cited by 2,741
Eysenck, H. J. (1983) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(83)90055-4 · Cited by 2,386
Mental health of children and adolescents in Great Britain
Meltzer, H., Gatward, R., Goodman, R., & Ford, T. (2003) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/0954026021000046155 · Cited by 1,214
Preventing Adolescent Health-Risk Behaviors by Strengthening Protection During Childhood
Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Kosterman, R., Abbott, R., & Hill, K. G. (1999) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.153.3.226 · Cited by 1,030
LOEBER, R., & FARRINGTON, D. P. (2000) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579400004107 · Cited by 926
Cited by
A meta-analysis of parent training: Moderators and follow-up effects
Lundahl, B., Risser, H. J., & Lovejoy, M. C. (2006) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.004 · Cited by 1,072
Financial cost of social exclusion: follow up study of antisocial children into adulthood
Scott, S., Knapp, M., Henderson, J., & Maughan, B. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7306.191 · Cited by 906
Self-citationWebster-Stratton, C., & Taylor, T. (2001) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1023/a:1011510923900 · Cited by 585
Self-citationGardner, F., Burton, J., & Klimes, I. (2006) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01668.x · Cited by 507
McCart, M. R., Priester, P. E., Davies, W. H., & Azen, R. (2006) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-006-9031-1 · Cited by 505
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, S., Webster-Stratton, C., Spender, Q., Doolan, M., Jacobs, B., & Aspland, H.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-07-28
- Volume
- 323
- Issue
- 7306
- Pages
- 194
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2102919055
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicentre controlled trial of parenting groups for childhood antisocial behaviour in clinical practiceCommentary: nipping conduct problems in the bud. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.323.7306.194
- The paper
- Scott, S., Webster-Stratton, C., Spender, Q., Doolan, M., Jacobs, B., & Aspland, H. (2001). Multicentre controlled trial of parenting groups for childhood antisocial behaviour in clinical practiceCommentary: nipping conduct problems in the bud. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7306.194
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.