Cited by 213Sex and Gender in HealthcareCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsHealthcare Systems and Public Health

Sex matters: secular and geographical trends in sex differences in coronary heart disease mortality

Open access
Lawlor, D A, Ebrahim, S, Smith, G Davey·2001·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To examine secular trends and geographical variations in sex differences in mortality from coronary heart disease and investigate how these relate to distributions in risk factors. Design: National and international data were used to examine secular trends and geographical variations in sex differences in mortality from coronary heart disease and risk factors. Setting: England and Wales, 1921-98; Australia, France, Japan, Sweden, and the United States, 1947-97; 50 countries, 1992-6. Data sources: Office for National Statistics, World Health Organization, and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Results: The 20th century epidemic of coronary heart disease affected only men in most industrialised countries and had a very rapid onset in England and Wales, which has been examined in detail. If this male only epidemic had not occurred there would have been 1.2 million fewer deaths from coronary heart disease in men in England and Wales over the past 50 years. Secular trends in mean per capita fat consumption show a similar pattern to secular trends in coronary heart disease mortality in men. Fat consumption is positively correlated with coronary heart disease mortality in men ( r s =0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.86) and inversely associated with coronary heart disease mortality in women (—0.30; —0.49 to —0.08) over this time. Although sex ratios for mortality from coronary heart disease show a clear period effect, those for lung cancer show a cohort effect. Sex ratios for stroke mortality were constant and close to unity for the entire period. Geographical variations in the sex ratio for coronary heart disease were associated with mean per capita fat consumption (0.64; 0.44 to 0.78) but were not associated with the sex ratio for smoking. Conclusion: Sex differences are largely the result of environmental factors and hence not inevitable. Understanding the factors that determine sex differences has important implications for public health, particularly for countries and parts of countries where the death rates for coronary heart disease are currently increasing. What is already known on this topic: Mortality for coronary heart disease is greater in men than women in most industrialised countries The most widely accepted explanation for this difference is that women are protected by oestrogen What this study adds: The sex difference in mortality from coronary heart disease varies over time and between countries in a way that cannot be explained by endogenous oestrogen These trends indicate that sex differences in mortality from coronary heart disease are driven primarily by environmental factors Sex differences in coronary heart disease are not inevitable Understanding more about the factors that cause the sex differences in mortality from coronary heart disease has important public health implications

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.541

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med 2000;19:335-51.
  2. Cooper S. Snoek piquante. The trials and tribulations of the British housewife. In: Siaaons, M, French P, eds. Age of austerity 1945-51. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986:34-57.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lawlor, D. A., Ebrahim, S., & Smith, G. D.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Lawlor, D A
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2001-09-08
Volume
323
Issue
7312
Pages
541-545
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2157634665
Cited by
213
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
17.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Keywords
sex differences, coronary heart disease mortality, secular trends, regional variation, sex ratio, dietary fat intake, dietary fat, environmental determinants of health, estrogen, smoking, lung cancer mortality, stroke mortality, cohort effects, period effects, England and Wales, cross-national comparison, public health policy, sex differences in risk factors, women's health, cardiovascular disease prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Coronary Disease, Dietary Fats, Europe, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, United States, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review