The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Birth weight, childhood socioeconomic environment, and cognitive development in the 1958 British birth cohort study
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: To examine the combined effect of social class and weight at birth on cognitive trajectories during school age and the associations between birth weight and educational outcomes through to 33 years. Design : Longitudinal, population based, birth cohort study. Participants : 10 845 males and females born during 3-9 March 1958 with information on birth weight, social class, and cognitive tests. Main outcome measures : Reading, maths, draw a man, copying designs, verbal and non-verbal ability tests at ages 7, 11, and 16, highest qualifications achieved by 33, and trajectories of maths standardised scores at 7-16 years. Results : The outcome of all childhood cognitive tests and educational achievements improved significantly with increasing birth weight. Analysis of maths scores at 7 and of highest qualifications achieved by 33 showed that the relations were robust to adjustment for potential confounding factors. For each kilogram increase in birth weight, maths z score increased by 0.17 (adjusted estimate 0.15, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.21) for males and 0.21 (0.20, 0.14 to 0.25) for females. Trajectories of maths z scores between 7 and 16 years diverged for different social class groups: participants from classes I and II increased their relative position on the score with increasing age, whereas classes IV and V showed a relative decline with increasing age. Birth weight explained much less of the variation in cognition than did social class (range 0.5-1.5% v 2.9-12.5%). Conclusions : The postnatal environment has an overwhelming influence on cognitive function through to early adulthood, but these strong effects do not explain the weaker but independent association with birth weight.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Socioeconomic status and the brain: mechanistic insights from human and animal research
Hackman, D. A., Farah, M. J., & Meaney, M. J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2897 · Cited by 1,409
How the Timing and Quality of Early Experiences Influence the Development of Brain Architecture
Fox, S. E., Levitt, P., & Nelson, C. A. (2010) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01380.x · Cited by 1,088
Fetal Origins of Mental Health: The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease Hypothesis
O’Donnell, K. J., & Meaney, M. J. (2017) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16020138 · Cited by 608
A conceptual framework for the developmental origins of health and disease
Gluckman, P. D., Hanson, M. A., & Buklijas, T. (2010) · Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease · doi:10.1017/s2040174409990171 · Cited by 592
The Fetal Matrix: Evolution, Development and Disease
Gluckman, P., & Hanson, M. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139106955 · Cited by 460
Metadata
- Authors
- Jefferis, B. J. M. H., Power, C., & Hertzman, C.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-08-10
- Volume
- 325
- Issue
- 7359
- Pages
- 305
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2108205473
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Birth weight, childhood socioeconomic environment, and cognitive development in the 1958 British birth cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.325.7359.305
- The paper
- Jefferis, B. J. M. H., Power, C., & Hertzman, C. (2002). Birth weight, childhood socioeconomic environment, and cognitive development in the 1958 British birth cohort study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7359.305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.