Cited by 10Cancer survivorship and careCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponsePalliative and Oncologic Care

Psychological coping and cancer

Open access
Maggie Watson, Janis Davidson-Homewood, Jo Haviland, Judith M. Bliss·2003·BMJ

Abstract

Editor—The review by Petticrew et al is flawed.1 Firstly, they do not compare like with like and ignore differing methods. Different instruments assess coping styles differently and may not be comparable. Thus conclusions cannot be drawn convincingly. Out of 28 studies, 13 had less than three years' follow up (shortest eight weeks). However, in relation to early breast cancer less than five years of follow up produces inconclusive results. Secondly, our study was relegated to the realms of irrelevance by saying that the recent large UK study (n=578), while of higher quality, reported mixed findings: helplessness or hopelessness predicted recurrence when patients with high and low scores were compared but not when it was the predominant coping style.2 The main importance of our clearly stated findings concerning helplessness and hopelessness was missed. Mixed findings were not reported. Although predominant coping style was arbitrarily defined, helplessness or hopelessness is robust across many studies. A high score on this subscale is a valid measure, reflecting a response amenable to psychological intervention. This finding was crucially important for encouraging adequate provision of psychological care in oncology, as was the small, cautiously interpreted tendency to poorer outcome found in severely depressed patients. Patient responsibility (or blame) is removed, and the onus shifts to the medical profession to identify and provide help for those at risk. Dismissal of our study—which used rigorous methods, controlled for known prognostic variables, was sufficiently large, had a long follow up, and found a survival effect—does the research no service. Better to conclude that many poor studies fail to show any effect of coping response on survival, but high quality studies provide evidence suggesting that further good research is needed. Meanwhile the adverse effect on outcome of a helpless or hopeless coping response clearly argues for the provision of better psychological resources.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.326.7389.598/a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watson, M., Davidson-Homewood, J., Haviland, J., & Bliss, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Maggie Watson
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-03-15
Volume
326
Issue
7389
Pages
598.2
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W99882266
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2013: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
coping, cancer, helplessness, hopelessness, breast cancer, tumor recurrence, survival, depression, psychological intervention, coping styles
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Neoplasms, Publishing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review