The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?
Open accessAbstract
Much animal research into potential treatments for humans is wasted because it is poorly conducted and not evaluated through systematic reviews
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review
DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1014628810714 · Cited by 1,544
Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction
Lau, J., Antman, E. M., Jimenez-Silva, J., Kupelnick, B., Mosteller, F., & Chalmers, T. C. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199207233270406 · Cited by 1,140
Does Mentoring Work?: An Impact Study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters Program
Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P. (1998) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x9802200304 · Cited by 436
Diversion of juvenile offenders: An experimental comparison.
Davidson, W. S., Redner, R., Blakely, C. H., & Mitchell, C. M. (1987) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.55.1.68 · Cited by 106
Secondary prevention as context for assessing change processes in aggressive children
Cavell, T. A., & Hughes, J. N. (2000) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-4405(99)00040-0 · Cited by 105
Cited by
Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412 · Cited by 7,300
Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research
Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics · doi:10.4103/0976-500x.72351 · Cited by 6,277
Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases
Seok, J., Warren, H. S., Cuenca, A. G., Mindrinos, M. N., Baker, H. V., Xu, W., Richards, D. R., McDonald-Smith, G. P., Gao, H., Hennessy, L., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1222878110 · Cited by 3,005
Comparison of Treatment Effects between Animal Experiments and Clinical Trials: Systematic Review
Perel, P., Roberts, I., Sena, E., Wheble, P., Briscoe, C., Sandercock, P., Macleod, M., Mignini, L. E., Jayaram, P., & Khan, K. S. (2007) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39048.407928.be · Cited by 827
Self-citationTranslation of Research Evidence From Animals to Humans
Hackam, D. G., & Redelmeier, D. A. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.14.1731 · Cited by 733
Metadata
- Authors
- Pound, P., Ebrahim, S., Sandercock, P., Bracken, M. B., & Roberts, I.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2004-02-26
- Volume
- 328
- Issue
- 7438
- Pages
- 514-517
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1971872860
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 29.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.328.7438.514
- The paper
- Pound, P., Ebrahim, S., Sandercock, P., Bracken, M. B., & Roberts, I. (2004). Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans? BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7438.514
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
