Cited by 438Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportCrime Patterns and Interventions

Does Mentoring Work?: An Impact Study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters Program

Grossman, Jean Baldwin, Tierney, Joseph P.·1998·Evaluation Review

Abstract

Our random assignment evaluation found that this type of mentonng had a significant positive effect on youths ages 10 to 16. Over the 18-month follow-up pertod, youths participating in Big Brothers Big Sisters Programs were significantly less likely to have started using illegal drugs or alcohol, hit someone, or skipped school. They were also more confident about their school performance and got along better with their families. Mentors were carefully screened, trained, and matched with a youth whom they met, on average, three or four times a month for approximately a year The program also provtdes careful professional supervision of these matches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0193841x9802200304

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A limitation of mentoring may be that providers may be less accountable as volunteers and/or may not be well prepared for challenges of developing and maintaining a relationship with sometimes challenging and less appreciative youth.

    “Thus, it has been noted that one limitation of mentoring may be that providers may be less accountable as they are volunteers and/or may not be well prepared for challenges of developing and maintaining a relationship with sometimes challenging and less appreciative youth (Grossman & Tierney, 1998).”
  • Evaluations of volunteer mentoring programs provide evidence of positive influences on adolescent developmental outcomes, including improvements in academic achievement, self-concept, prosocial behavior, and interpersonal relationships.

    “Evaluations of volunteer mentoring programs provide evidence of positive influences on adolescent developmental outcomes, including improvements in academic achievement, self-concept, prosocial behavior, and interpersonal relationships (Davidson, Redner, Blakely, Mitchell, & Esmhoff, 1987;DuBois & Neville, 1997;Grossman & Tierney;1998;LoSciuto, Rajala, Townsend, & Taylor, 1996).”

    From The Test of Time: Predictors and Effects of Duration in Youth Mentoring Relationships (2002) · cites this paper as Grossman & Tierney;1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P.
Affiliations
Public/Private Ventures (US)
Venue
Evaluation Review
Published
1998-06
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
403-426
ISSN
  • 0145-4692 (ISSN-L)
  • 0193-841X
  • 1552-3926
OpenAlex
W2096691947
Cited by
436
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 26
FWCI
7.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evaluation Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
mentoring, Big Brothers Big Sisters, youth development, substance use prevention, alcohol consumption, violence prevention, school attendance, academic self-confidence, family relationships, program effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review